Literature DB >> 17433779

Incidence, etiology, classification, and management of neuralgia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in 226 patients.

Manoj Krishna1, Raymond D Pollock, Chandra Bhatia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Neurological symptoms are a well-recognized complication after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. Concerns about this potential problem may deter surgeons from performing the procedure.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, etiology, prevention, and management of neuralgia after PLIF surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent PLIF surgery at a university hospital in the north east of England. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred sixty patients who met the inclusion criteria of degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, and postlaminectomy/postdiscectomy syndrome underwent PLIF surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure of neuralgia was assessed postoperatively by a subjective description of leg pain. Patients were considered to have post PLIF neuralgia if they complained of severe radiculopathy, which was not present before surgery.
METHODS: During the study period April 1996 to April 2002, all patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent the PLIF procedure. Outcome was assessed postoperatively. In all but the first 20 cases, interbody cages were used. A subtotal superior facetectomy was performed on the first 103 patients. The subsequent 123 patients had a total removal of the superior facet. Autogenous bone and pedicle screws and plates were used in all cases.
RESULTS: The study group comprised 226 patients (121 women, 105 men; mean age at surgery, 44.1 years; age range, 12-81 years). Duration of symptoms ranged from 5 to 480 months (mean, 90.6 months; median, 60.0). Overall, there were 16 cases of neuralgia in 226 patients (7.1%). In the subtotal facetectomy group, 10 of the 103 patients (9.7%) had neuralgic symptoms. In the total facetectomy group, 6 of the 123 patients (4.9%) had neuralgic symptoms. The difference in incidence was not statistically significant (p=.158).
CONCLUSIONS: This study describes our experiences of post-PLIF neuralgia. It outlines strategies for prevention and management of the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17433779     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  12 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Lumbar interbody fusion with utilization of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein: a retrospective real-life study about 277 patients.

Authors:  Stéphane Litrico; Tristan Langlais; Florent Pennes; Antoine Gennari; Philippe Paquis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an "old" technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Marco Sassi; Alessandro Ortolina; Andrea Cardia; Roberto Assietti; Alberto Zerbi; Martin Lorenzetti; Fabio Galbusera; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Tague M Thorson; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Honggang Wang; Yue Zhou; Zhengfeng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Modified minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a trans-multifidus approach: a safe and effective alternative to open-TLIF.

Authors:  Wenzhi Zhang; Xu Li; Xifu Shang; Xiang Xu; Yefeng Hu; Rui He; Liqun Duan; Xiaodong Ling; Feng Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Conservative management of psoas haematoma following complex lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Sandesh Lakkol; Praveen Sarda; Prasad Karpe; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  "Post-Decompressive Neuropathy": New-Onset Post-Laminectomy Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Different from the Preoperative Complaint.

Authors:  Lorraine A T Boakye; Mitchell S Fourman; Nicholas T Spina; Dann Laudermilch; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16

9.  The feasibility for a novel minimally invasive surgery-percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a cadaveric experiment.

Authors:  Peng Yin; Yaoshen Zhang; Aixing Pan; Yi Ding; Liming Zhang; Chunyang Xu; Jincai Yang; Yong Hai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.

Authors:  Chad D Cole; Todd D McCall; Meic H Schmidt; Andrew T Dailey
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.