Literature DB >> 21404031

Stand-alone cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of high-degree degenerative disc disease: design of a new device for an "old" technique. A prospective study on a series of 116 patients.

Francesco Costa1, Marco Sassi, Alessandro Ortolina, Andrea Cardia, Roberto Assietti, Alberto Zerbi, Martin Lorenzetti, Fabio Galbusera, Maurizio Fornari.   

Abstract

Chronic lumbar pain due to degenerative disc disease affects a large number of people, including those of fully active age. The usual self-repair system observed in nature is a spontaneous attempt at arthrodesis, which in most cases leads to pseudoarthrosis. In recent years, many possible surgical fusion techniques have been introduced; PLIF is one of these. Because of the growing interest in minimally invasive surgery and the unsatisfactory results reported in the literature (mainly due to the high incidence of morbidity and complications), a new titanium lumbar interbody cage (I-FLY) has been developed to achieve solid bone fusion by means of a stand-alone posterior device. The head of the cage is blunt and tapered so that it can be used as a blunt spreader, and the core is small, which facilitates self-positioning. From 2003 to 2007, 119 patients were treated for chronic lumbar discopathy (Modic grade III and Pfirrmann grade V) with I-FLY cages used as stand-alone devices. All patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and after 1 and 2 years by means of a neurological examination, visual analogue score (VAS) and Prolo Economic and Functional Scale. Radiological results were evaluated by polyaxial computed tomography (CT) scan and flexion-extension radiography. Fusion was defined as the absence of segmental instability on flexion-extension radiography and Bridwell grade I or II on CT scan. Patients were considered clinical "responders" if VAS evaluation showed any improvement over baseline values and a Prolo value >7 was recorded. At the last follow-up examination, clinical success was deemed to have been achieved in 90.5% of patients; the rate of bone fusion was 99.1%, as evaluated by flexion-extension radiography, and 92.2%, as evaluated by CT scan. Morbidity (nerve root injury, dural lesions) and complications (subsidence and pseudoarthrosis) were minimal. PLIF by means of the stand-alone I-FLY cage can be regarded as a possible surgical treatment for chronic low-back pain due to high-degree DDD. This technique is not demanding and can be considered safe and effective, as shown by the excellent clinical and radiological success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404031      PMCID: PMC3087031          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1755-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  48 in total

1.  Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Prediction of mechanical behaviors at interfaces between bone and two interbody cages of lumbar spine segments.

Authors:  Y Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Intervertebral bone implants following excision of protruded lumbar discs.

Authors:  L A Christoferson; B Selland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee; M L Lewis; L M Quinn; J M Persenaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device.

Authors:  W J Elias; N E Simmons; G J Kaptain; J B Chadduck; R Whitehill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  The treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders. A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Normal interpediculate distances (minimum and maximum) in children and adults.

Authors:  V C Hinck; W M Clark; C E Hopkins
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1966-05

8.  Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; John D Dorchak; D Lynn Sanders
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Fred H Geisler; Scott L Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Paul C McAfee; John J Regan; J Patrick Johnson; Bradford Mullin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

10.  Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?

Authors:  K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; K W McEnery; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dual delivery for stem cell differentiation using dexamethasone and bFGF in/on polymeric microspheres as a cell carrier for nucleus pulposus regeneration.

Authors:  C Z Liang; H Li; Y Q Tao; X P Zhou; Z R Yang; Y X Xiao; F C Li; B Han; Q X Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION IN PACIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN.

Authors:  Alberto Augusto; Rennan Guilherme Dias; Marcelo Wajchenberg; Delio Martins
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik Van de Kelft; Johan Van Goethem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prospective analysis of a new bone graft in lumbar interbody fusion: results of a 2- year prospective clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Philippe Lauweryns; Yannic Raskin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 5.  Regulatory role of hypoxia inducible factor in the biological behavior of nucleus pulposus cells.

Authors:  Hao Li; Cheng Zhen Liang; Qi Xin Chen
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Donatella Prosperi; Marco Boschi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-10

7.  Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ming-Chieh Chiang; Jin-Fu Lin; Shang-Chih Lin; Ching-Hua Hung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.