Literature DB >> 17430615

Principles and practice in ethical review of animal experiments across Europe: summary of the report of a FELASA working group on ethical evaluation of animal experiments.

J A Smith1, F A R van den Broek, J Cantó Martorell, H Hackbarth, O Ruksenas, W Zeller.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes a more detailed report produced by the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA 2005), which describes and explores a set of principles for the conduct of ethical review of laboratory animal use. It presents a synopsis of results from a questionnaire that elicited information on how each of 20 countries represented in FELASA currently approaches such ethical review. This information suggests that, although local practices differ, there is an emerging consensus on the key elements that any ethical review process should involve. Drawing on the questionnaire findings, this summary also includes a brief discussion to support and amplify a series of recommendations, covering the objectives of ethical review; legal requirements; the scope of work reviewed and the 'level' at which review is approached; general principles for the organization of ethical review processes; the factors considered in the review; needs for ongoing review after initial authorization; participants in the review process; wider impacts of the review process; and strategies that can help to ensure quality and consistency of review outcomes. For further information and examples of current practice, as well as more detailed discussion to support the recommendations, readers are urged to refer to the complete report, available at http://www.lal.org.uk/pdffiles/FELASA_ethics_FULL_Report. pdf or via: http://www.felasa.eu/recommendations.htm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17430615     DOI: 10.1258/002367707780378212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  23 in total

Review 1.  FELASA guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Javier Guillen
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Approaches to animal research project evaluation in Europe after implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU.

Authors:  Javier Guillén; Sally Robinson; Thierry Decelle; Cornelia Exner; Martje Fentener van Vlissingen
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Classification and reporting of severity experienced by animals used in scientific procedures: FELASA/ECLAM/ESLAV Working Group report.

Authors:  David Smith; David Anderson; Anne-Dominique Degryse; Carla Bol; Ana Criado; Alessia Ferrara; Nuno Henrique Franco; Istvan Gyertyan; Jose M Orellana; Grete Ostergaard; Orsolya Varga; Hanna-Marja Voipio
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Combined Effect of Neutron and Proton Radiations on the Growth of Solid Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma and Remote Effects in Mice.

Authors:  V E Balakin; O M Rozanova; E N Smirnova; T A Belyakova; A E Shemyakov; N S Strelnikova
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 0.788

Review 5.  Current concepts of Harm-Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 1.

Authors:  Aurora Brønstad; Christian E Newcomer; Thierry Decelle; Jeffrey I Everitt; Javier Guillen; Kathy Laber
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.

Authors:  Orsolya Varga
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm-benefit analysis in animal models of disease.

Authors:  Melanie L Graham; Mark J Prescott
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 8.  Animal welfare in studies on murine tuberculosis: assessing progress over a 12-year period and the need for further improvement.

Authors:  Nuno Henrique Franco; Margarida Correia-Neves; I Anna S Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of methanolic fraction of Kalanchoe crenata on metabolic parameters in adriamycin-induced renal impairment in rats.

Authors:  René Kamgang; Angèle F Foyet; Jean-Louis O Essame; Jeanne Y Ngogang
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.200

10.  A Handful of Details to Ensure the Experimental Reproducibility on the FORCED Running Wheel in Rodents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Garrigos; Marta Martínez-Morga; Angel Toval; Yevheniy Kutsenko; Alberto Barreda; Bruno Ribeiro Do Couto; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; José Luis Ferran
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.