Literature DB >> 29359995

Classification and reporting of severity experienced by animals used in scientific procedures: FELASA/ECLAM/ESLAV Working Group report.

David Smith1, David Anderson2, Anne-Dominique Degryse3, Carla Bol4, Ana Criado5, Alessia Ferrara6, Nuno Henrique Franco7, Istvan Gyertyan8, Jose M Orellana9, Grete Ostergaard10, Orsolya Varga11, Hanna-Marja Voipio12.   

Abstract

Directive 2010/63/EU introduced requirements for the classification of the severity of procedures to be applied during the project authorisation process to use animals in scientific procedures and also to report actual severity experienced by each animal used in such procedures. These requirements offer opportunities during the design, conduct and reporting of procedures to consider the adverse effects of procedures and how these can be reduced to minimize the welfare consequences for the animals. Better recording and reporting of adverse effects should also help in highlighting priorities for refinement of future similar procedures and benchmarking good practice. Reporting of actual severity should help inform the public of the relative severity of different areas of scientific research and, over time, may show trends regarding refinement. Consistency of assignment of severity categories across Member States is a key requirement, particularly if re-use is considered, or the safeguard clause is to be invoked. The examples of severity classification given in Annex VIII are limited in number, and have little descriptive power to aid assignment. Additionally, the examples given often relate to the procedure and do not attempt to assess the outcome, such as adverse effects that may occur. The aim of this report is to deliver guidance on the assignment of severity, both prospectively and at the end of a procedure. A number of animal models, in current use, have been used to illustrate the severity assessment process from inception of the project, through monitoring during the course of the procedure to the final assessment of actual severity at the end of the procedure (Appendix 1).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animals; ethics & welfare; humane end-point; procedures; refinement; severity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29359995      PMCID: PMC5987990          DOI: 10.1177/0023677217744587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  40 in total

1.  A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes.

Authors:  K H Diehl; R Hull; D Morton; R Pfister; Y Rabemampianina; D Smith; J M Vidal; C van de Vorstenbosch
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Principles and practice in ethical review of animal experiments across Europe: summary of the report of a FELASA working group on ethical evaluation of animal experiments.

Authors:  J A Smith; F A R van den Broek; J Cantó Martorell; H Hackbarth; O Ruksenas; W Zeller
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Animal models of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Amteshwar Singh Jaggi; Vivek Jain; Nirmal Singh
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.748

Review 4.  Role of late sodium channel current block in the management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Animal models of tuberculosis.

Authors:  U D Gupta; V M Katoch
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.131

Review 6.  New anti-tuberculosis drugs: strategies, sources and new molecules.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Palomino; Daniela Fernandes Ramos; Pedro Almeida da Silva
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw.

Authors:  S R Chaplan; F W Bach; J W Pogrel; J M Chung; T L Yaksh
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Intraluminal thread model of focal stroke in the non-human primate.

Authors:  Thomas Freret; Valentine Bouet; Jérôme Toutain; Romaric Saulnier; Palma Pro-Sistiaga; Ebeline Bihel; Eric T Mackenzie; Simon Roussel; Pascale Schumann-Bard; Omar Touzani
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Lessons from experimental Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.

Authors:  JoAnne L Flynn
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.700

Review 10.  Assessment of cognitive and motor deficits in a marmoset model of stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan W B Marshall; Rosalind M Ridley
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2003
View more
  7 in total

1.  Physiologic Effects of Prolonged Terminal Anesthesia in Sheep (Ovis gmelini aries).

Authors:  Nina E Trimmel; Melanie M Hierweger; Simone Jucker; Lisa Windhofer; Miriam Weisskopf
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.565

2.  Phenotyping Young GluA1 Deficient Mice - A Behavioral Characterization in a Genetic Loss-of-Function Model.

Authors:  Maria Reiber; Helen Stirling; Rolf Sprengel; Peter Gass; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Navigating Uncertainties: How to Assess Welfare and Harm in Genetically Altered Animals Responsibly-A Practical Guideline.

Authors:  Anne Zintzsch; Elena Noe; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Comparing distress of mouse models for liver damage.

Authors:  Guanglin Tang; Nico Seume; Christine Häger; Simone Kumstel; Kerstin Abshagen; André Bleich; Brigitte Vollmar; Steven R Talbot; Xianbin Zhang; Dietmar Zechner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The "WWHow" Concept for Prospective Categorization of Post-operative Severity Assessment in Mice and Rats.

Authors:  Anke Tappe-Theodor; Claudia Pitzer; Lars Lewejohann; Paulin Jirkof; Katja Siegeler; Astra Segelcke; Natascha Drude; Bruno Pradier; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Britta Hollinderbäumer; Daniel Segelcke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Brexit: A Boon or a Curse for Animals Used in Scientific Procedures?

Authors:  Rachel Dunn
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Computed Tomography-based evaluation of porcine cardiac dimensions to assist in pre-study planning and optimized model selection for pre-clinical research.

Authors:  Miriam Lipiski; Matthias Eberhard; Thea Fleischmann; Sascha Halvachizadeh; Beate Kolb; Francesco Maisano; Mareike Sauer; Volkmar Falk; Maximilian Y Emmert; Hatem Alkadhi; Nikola Cesarovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.