BACKGROUND: Although well defined for embryos at cleavage stages, the occurrence and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts is relatively unknown. It has been reported that only one in four blastocysts is comprised totally of chromosomally normal cells. One of the selection mechanisms for the embryo proper to become free of these chromosomally abnormal cells would be to sequester them to the extra-embryonic compartment during development. The study aim was to investigate whether such a mechanism of selection exists in human preimplantation embryos. METHODS: Inner cell mass (ICM)/trophectoderm (TE) differentiation was performed, followed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), to study the chromosomal distribution in both populations of cells. RESULTS: Of the 94 successfully analysed blastocysts, 68.8 +/- 1.5% of all analysable nuclei per blastocyst showed a disomic chromosomal content. Only 22.6% of blastocysts analysed were classified as normal. Of the embryos classified as abnormal at the blastocyst stage, 11.9% showed a simple mosaic pattern and 32.1% a complex mosaic pattern. An equally large group of blastocysts showed either a chaotic pattern (16.7%), or the chromosomal pattern could not be classified. The average degree of normal cells in the ICM (67.9%) was similar to the degree observed in the TE (69.5%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that chromosomally abnormal cells are not preferentially segregating to the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage. Hence, other mechanisms should be responsible for an absence of chromosomally abnormal cells in the embryo proper at later stages of development. One possible mechanism might be the elimination of the chromosomally abnormal cells by selective cell death activation.
BACKGROUND: Although well defined for embryos at cleavage stages, the occurrence and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in humanblastocysts is relatively unknown. It has been reported that only one in four blastocysts is comprised totally of chromosomally normal cells. One of the selection mechanisms for the embryo proper to become free of these chromosomally abnormal cells would be to sequester them to the extra-embryonic compartment during development. The study aim was to investigate whether such a mechanism of selection exists in human preimplantation embryos. METHODS: Inner cell mass (ICM)/trophectoderm (TE) differentiation was performed, followed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), to study the chromosomal distribution in both populations of cells. RESULTS: Of the 94 successfully analysed blastocysts, 68.8 +/- 1.5% of all analysable nuclei per blastocyst showed a disomic chromosomal content. Only 22.6% of blastocysts analysed were classified as normal. Of the embryos classified as abnormal at the blastocyst stage, 11.9% showed a simple mosaic pattern and 32.1% a complex mosaic pattern. An equally large group of blastocysts showed either a chaotic pattern (16.7%), or the chromosomal pattern could not be classified. The average degree of normal cells in the ICM (67.9%) was similar to the degree observed in the TE (69.5%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that chromosomally abnormal cells are not preferentially segregating to the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage. Hence, other mechanisms should be responsible for an absence of chromosomally abnormal cells in the embryo proper at later stages of development. One possible mechanism might be the elimination of the chromosomally abnormal cells by selective cell death activation.
Authors: Gianfranco Coppola; Basil Alexander; Dino Di Berardino; Elizabeth St John; Parvathi K Basrur; W Allan King Journal: Chromosome Res Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 5.239
Authors: Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray Journal: Mol Hum Reprod Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Alexandra N Bogomazova; Maria A Lagarkova; Leyla V Tskhovrebova; Maria V Shutova; Sergey L Kiselev Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.682