Literature DB >> 1742833

Measurement of cardiac output--transtracheal Doppler versus thermodilution.

N Froese1, R Friesen.   

Abstract

The ABCOM 1 transtracheal Doppler (TTD) has been developed as a non-invasive cardiac output monitor. With this device, cardiac output is continuously calculated from ascending aortic blood flow velocity and aortic diameter obtained via an ultrasound transducer incorporated into the tip of an endotracheal tube. We evaluated the clinical use of the ABCOM 1 monitor and compared cardiac outputs obtained using the TTD system with simultaneous thermodilution (TD) measurements. We found the operation of the ABCOM 1 monitor to be difficult and time-consuming. In our operating rooms, acceptable Doppler signal quality was difficult to obtain. There was no correlation between 36 simultaneously obtained TTD and TD cardiac output measurements. The average difference between measurement techniques and the limits of agreement were unacceptably large (mean difference = 3.04 L.min-1, mean +/- 2 SD = -6.04 to 12.48 L.min-1). Separately analyzing only those measurements during which Doppler signal quality was adequate did not improve agreement between TTD and TD measurements. On the basis of these findings, TTD cannot be recommended as a clinical cardiac output measurement technique.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1742833     DOI: 10.1007/BF03036977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Transtracheal Doppler: a new procedure for continuous cardiac output measurement.

Authors:  J H Abrams; R E Weber; K D Holmen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Intraoperative cardiac output monitoring by transtracheal Doppler tube.

Authors:  S Yoshitake; S Matsumoto; H Miyakawa; T Takahashi; T Kitano; H Iwasaka; Y Hayano; T Noguchi; K Taniguchi; N Honda
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Stetz; R G Miller; G E Kelly; T A Raffin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-12

5.  Continuous cardiac output determination using transtracheal Doppler: initial results in humans.

Authors:  J H Abrams; R E Weber; K D Holmen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Effects of mechanical ventilation on the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Authors:  J V Synder; D J Powner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 7.598

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Yan Wang; Jing Shi; Zhiqiang Hua; Jinyu Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.