| Literature DB >> 17426704 |
O Nehls1, T Okech, C-J Hsieh, T Enzinger, M Sarbia, F Borchard, H-H Gruenagel, V Gaco, H G Hass, H T Arkenau, J T Hartmann, R Porschen, M Gregor, B Klump.
Abstract
We evaluated the expression patterns of proapoptotic BAX, antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and p53, the proposed upstream effector of these molecules, as potential prognostic markers in UICC stage III colon cancer by immunohistochemical staining. To identify high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI+) individuals, we performed single-strand conformation polymorphism-based analysis for BAT26. A total of 188 patients who had received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU/folinic acid or 5-FU/levamisole) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 84.5 months. We found that BAX, Bcl-2 and p53 protein expressions were high or positive in 59, 70 and 50% of 188 cases, respectively. MSI+ tumours were detected in 9% of 174 evaluable patients. BAX or Bcl-2 was correlated with a higher degree of differentiation or left-sided tumours (P=0.01 or P=0.03, respectively); MSI was correlated with right-sided tumours (P<0.0001). In contrast to p53, Bcl-2, or MSI, low BAX, advanced pN category, low grade of differentiation and treatment with 5-FU/levamisole were univariately associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.0005, P=0.001, P=0.005 and P=0.01, respectively) and poorer overall survival (OS) (P=0.002, P=0.0001, P=0.003 and P=0.02, respectively). Besides pN category and treatment arm, BAX was an independent variable related to both OS and DFS (P=0.003 and P=0.001, respectively). In both univariate and multivariate analysis, the p53-/BAX high in comparison with the p53+/BAX high subset conferred a significantly improved DFS (P=0.03 and P=0.03, respectively) as well as a marginally improved OS (P=0.07 and P=0.08, respectively). BAX protein expression may be of central significance for clinical outcome to 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, and bivariate analysis of p53/BAX possibly may provide further prognostic evidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17426704 PMCID: PMC2360187 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinicopathological parameters in relation to p53, BAX and Bcl-2 protein expression (n=188)
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||||
| Male | 79 | 44 (55.7) | 35 (44.3) | 0.43 | 52 (65.8) | 27 (44.2) | 0.33 | 42 (53.2) | 37 (46.8) | 0.46 |
| Female | 109 | 67 (61.5) | 42 (38.5) | 79 (72.5) | 30 (27.5) | 52 (47.7) | 57 (52.3) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| ⩽62 | 98 | 63 (64.3) | 35 (35.7) | 0.13 | 68 (69.4) | 30 (30.6) | 0.93 | 52 (53.1) | 46 (46.9) | 0.38 |
| >62 | 90 | 48 (53.3) | 42 (46.7) | 63 (70.0) | 27 (30.0) | 42 (46.7) | 48 (53.3) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| T2 | 19 | 11 (57.9) | 8 (42.1) | 0.92 | 15 (78.9) | 4 (21.1) | 0.35 | 10 (52.6) | 9 (47.4) | 0.81 |
| T3–4 | 169 | 100 (59.2) | 69 (40.8) | 116 (68.6) | 53 (31.4) | 84 (49.7) | 85 (50.3) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| N1 | 107 | 67 (62.6) | 40 (37.4) | 0.25 | 75 (70.1) | 32 (29.9) | 0.89 | 49 (45.8) | 58 (54.2) | 0.19 |
| N2–3 | 81 | 44 (54.3) | 37 (45.7) | 56 (69.1) | 25 (30.9) | 45 (55.6) | 36 (44.4) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| G1–2 | 138 | 89 (64.5) | 49 (35.5) |
| 97 (70.3) | 41 (29.7) | 0.76 | 69 (50.0) | 69 (50.0) | 1 |
| G3–4 | 50 | 22 (44.0) | 28 (56.0) | 34 (68.0) | 16 (32.0) | 25 (50.0) | 25 (50.0) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Right | 93 | 51 (54.8) | 42 (45.2) | 0.25 | 58 (62.4) | 35 (37.6) |
| 43 (46.2) | 50 (53.8) | 0.31 |
| Left | 95 | 60 (63.2) | 35 (36.8) | 73 (76.8) | 22 (23.2) | 51 (53.7) | 44 (46.3) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Arm A (5-FU/LV) | 95 | 56 (58.9) | 39 (41.1) | 0.98 | 69 (72.6) | 26 (27.4) | 0.37 | 44 (46.3) | 51 (53.7) | 0.31 |
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) | 93 | 55 (59.1) | 38 (40.9) | 62 (66.7) | 31 (33.3) | 50 (53.8) | 43 (46.2) | |||
G1, well; G2, moderately; G3, poorly; G4, anaplastic. Bold values signify P<0.05.
Clinicopathological parameters in relation to microsatellite status (n=174)
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Male | 76 | 71 (93) | 5 (7) | 0.29 |
| Female | 98 | 87 (89) | 11 (11) | |
|
| ||||
| ⩽62 | 93 | 88 (95) | 5 (5) | 0.06 |
| > 62 | 81 | 70 (86) | 11 (14) | |
|
| ||||
| T2 | 18 | 18 (100) | 0 (0) | 0.38 |
| T3–4 | 156 | 140 (90) | 16 (10) | |
|
| ||||
| N1 | 99 | 92 (93) | 7 (7) | 0.27 |
| N2–3 | 75 | 66 (88) | 9 (12) | |
|
| ||||
| G1–2 | 125 | 115 (92) | 10 (8) | 0.38 |
| G3–4 | 49 | 43 (88) | 6 (12) | |
|
| ||||
| Right | 87 | 71 (82) | 16 (18) | < |
| Left | 87 | 87 (100) | 0 (0) | |
|
| ||||
| Arm A (5-FU/LV) | 90 | 84 (93) | 6 (7) | 0.23 |
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) | 84 | 74 (88) | 10 (12) | |
G1, well; G2, moderately; G3, poorly; G4, anaplastic. Bold values signify P<0.05.
Figure 1Light microscope images (× 40) of immunohistochemistry of representative colon cancer samples classified as BSI high (BAX was quantitatively detected in all positive stained cells and BAX staining intensity was classified as strong) (A), Bcl-2 immunopositive (>5% cytoplasmic staining) (B) and p53 immunopositive (>5% nuclear staining) (C).
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier DFS analysis for BAX (BSI) alone (A), for the p53/BAX high phenotype, subdivided into its two subtypes (p53−/BSI high or p53+/BSI high) (B), or for the MSI/BSI phenotype, subdivided into its two subtypes (MSI−/BSI high or MSI+/BSI high) (C).
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier OS analysis for BAX (BSI) alone (A), for the p53/BAX high phenotype, subdivided into its two subtypes (p53−/BSI high or p53+/BSI high) (B), or for the MSI/BSI phenotype, subdivided into its two subtypes (MSI−/BSI high or MSI+/BSI high) (C).
Analysis of DFS and OS in relation to clinicopathological parameters, p53, BAX and Bcl-2 protein expression and MSI status
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Male | 79 | 57.1 | 0.2 | 68.8 | 0.3 |
| Female | 109 | 65.7 | 70.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| ⩽62 | 98 | 64.7 | 0.6 | 72.7 | 0.4 |
| >62 | 90 | 59.4 | 66.8 | ||
|
| |||||
| T2 | 19 | 83.9 | 0.05 | 83.9 | 0.1 |
| T3–4 | 169 | 59.7 | 68.3 | ||
|
| |||||
| N1 | 107 | 71.6 |
| 80.2 |
|
| N2–3 | 81 | 49.3 | 55.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| G1–2 | 138 | 66.8 |
| 74.9 |
|
| G3–4 | 50 | 49.3 | 55.6 | ||
|
| |||||
| Right | 93 | 66.9 | 0.1 | 74.2 | 0.3 |
| Left | 95 | 57.1 | 65.5 | ||
| Treatment arm | |||||
| Arm A (5-FU/LV) | 95 | 70.5 |
| 76.7 |
|
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) | 93 | 53.2 | 62.4 | ||
| BAX staining index | |||||
| High | 111 | 71.7 |
| 76.1 |
|
| Low | 77 | 48.2 | 60.7 | ||
| Bcl-2 expression | |||||
| Positive | 131 | 59.9 | 0.7 | 69.3 | 0.7 |
| Negative | 57 | 67.5 | 71.3 | ||
| p53 expression | |||||
| Positive | 94 | 57 | 0.2 | 67.3 | 0.2 |
| Negative | 94 | 67.3 | 72.6 | ||
| MSI status | |||||
| MSI− | 158 | 59.4 | 0.5 | 68 | 0.4 |
| MSI+ | 16 | 67.5 | 81.3 | ||
Kaplan–Meier curves compared by log-rank test.
DFS=disease-free survival; MSI=microsatellite instability; OS=overall survival. Bold values signify P<0.05.
Bivariate subgroup analysis of patients with high or low BSI lesions combined with either Bcl-2−/+ or p53−/+ or MSI−/+ samples in relation to 5-year DFS and 5-year OS (log-rank test)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSI high/Bcl-2− | 24 | 82.6 | 0.2 | 87.1 | 0.2 |
| BSI high/Bcl-2+ | 87 | 68.8 | 73.1 | ||
| BSI low/Bcl-2− | 33 | 56.8 | 0.7 | 59.5 | 0.7 |
| BSI low/Bcl-2+ | 44 | 41.4 | 61.4 | ||
| BSI high/p53− | 58 | 80.7 |
| 80.8 | 0.07 |
| BSI high/p53+ | 53 | 61.9 | 70.9 | ||
| BSI low/p53− | 36 | 45.5 | 0.7 | 58.5 | 0.8 |
| BSI low/p53+ | 41 | 50.4 | 62.6 | ||
| BSI high/MSI− | 97 | 68.6 | 0.11 | 73.7 | 0.13 |
| BSI high/MSI+ | 7 | 100 | 100 | ||
| BSI low/MSI− | 61 | 44.4 | 1 | 58.6 | 0.9 |
| BSI low/MSI+ | 9 | 55.6 | 66.7 |
BSI=BAX staining index; DFS=disease-free survival; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil; LEV=levamisole; MSI=microsatellite instability; OS=overall survival. Bold values signify P<0.05.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier OS analysis for the BAX/Bcl-2 group, subdivided in its four subsets (BSI high/Bcl-2−, BSI high/Bcl-2 +, BSI low/Bcl-2−, BSI low/Bcl-2+).
Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological and genetic parameters for DFS (Cox regression hazard analysis)
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Step 1 | |||
|
| |||
| T3/4 | 0.11 | 2.6 | 0.8–8.3 |
|
| |||
| N2/3 |
| 1.9 | 1.2–3.1 |
|
| |||
| G3/4 | 0.22 | 1.4 | 0.8–2.3 |
| Treatment arm | |||
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) |
| 1.9 | 1.2–3.0 |
|
| |||
| Low |
| 2.2 | 1.4–3.6 |
| Step 2 | |||
|
| |||
| T3/T4 | 0.09 | 2.7 | 0.9–8.7 |
|
| |||
| N2/3 |
| 2 | 1.2–3.2 |
|
| |||
| Low |
| 2.3 | 1.4–3.7 |
|
| |||
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) |
| 1.9 | 1.2–3.1 |
CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil; LEV=levamisole. Bold values signify P<0.05.
Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological and genetic parameters for OS (Cox regression hazard analysis)
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Step 1 | |||
|
| |||
| T3/4 | 0.27 | 2 | 0.6–6.3 |
|
| |||
| N2/3 |
| 2.3 | 1.4–3.8 |
|
| |||
| G3/4 | 0.18 | 1.4 | 0.9–2.4 |
|
| |||
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) |
| 1.8 | 1.1–3.8 |
|
| |||
| Low |
| 2.1 | 1.3–3.4 |
| Step 3 | |||
|
| |||
| N2/3 |
| 2.5 | 1.5–4.2 |
|
| |||
| Low |
| 2.1 | 1.3–3.5 |
|
| |||
| Arm B (5-FU/LEV) |
| 1.9 | 1.1–3.1 |
CI=confidence interval; 5-FU=5-fluorouracil; LEV=levamisole; OS=overall survival. Bold values signify P<0.05.