Literature DB >> 25142746

A model for genome size evolution.

Stephan Fischer1, Samuel Bernard, Guillaume Beslon, Carole Knibbe.   

Abstract

We present a model for genome size evolution that takes into account both local mutations such as small insertions and small deletions, and large chromosomal rearrangements such as duplications and large deletions. We introduce the possibility of undergoing several mutations within one generation. The model, albeit minimalist, reveals a non-trivial spontaneous dynamics of genome size: in the absence of selection, an arbitrary large part of genomes remains beneath a finite size, even for a duplication rate 2.6-fold higher than the rate of large deletions, and even if there is also a systematic bias toward small insertions compared to small deletions. Specifically, we show that the condition of existence of an asymptotic stationary distribution for genome size non-trivially depends on the rates and mean sizes of the different mutation types. We also give upper bounds for the median and other quantiles of the genome size distribution, and argue that these bounds cannot be overcome by selection. Taken together, our results show that the spontaneous dynamics of genome size naturally prevents it from growing infinitely, even in cases where intuition would suggest an infinite growth. Using quantitative numerical examples, we show that, in practice, a shrinkage bias appears very quickly in genomes undergoing mutation accumulation, even though DNA gains and losses appear to be perfectly symmetrical at first sight. We discuss this spontaneous dynamics in the light of the other evolutionary forces proposed in the literature and argue that it provides them a stability-related size limit below which they can act.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142746      PMCID: PMC4153982          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-014-9997-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  53 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of gene number: are heritable and non-heritable errors equally important?

Authors:  C Pál; L D Hurst
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  The evolutionary genomics of pathogen recombination.

Authors:  Philip Awadalla
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  M Nowak; P Schuster
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 4.  The genetic organization of chromosomes.

Authors:  C A Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 5.  Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease.

Authors:  James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Dmitri Petrov; David Ackerly; Paul Falkowski; Oscar M Schofield
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle.

Authors:  M Eigen; P Schuster
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1977-11

8.  Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli.

Authors:  T T Kibota; M Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 10.  Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  3 in total

1.  Beware batch culture: Seasonality and niche construction predicted to favor bacterial adaptive diversification.

Authors:  Charles Rocabert; Carole Knibbe; Jessika Consuegra; Dominique Schneider; Guillaume Beslon
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Transposable elements promote the evolution of genome streamlining.

Authors:  Bram van Dijk; Frederic Bertels; Lianne Stolk; Nobuto Takeuchi; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Adapting the engine to the fuel: mutator populations can reduce the mutational load by reorganizing their genome structure.

Authors:  Jacob Pieter Rutten; Paulien Hogeweg; Guillaume Beslon
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.