Literature DB >> 17418963

Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns Of Care Study analysis.

Benjamin Movsas1, Jennifer Moughan, Jean Owen, Lawrence R Coia, Michael J Zelefsky, Gerald Hanks, J Frank Wilson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify factors significantly influencing accrual to clinical protocols by analyzing radiation Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveys of 3,047 randomly selected radiotherapy (RT) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patterns of Care Study surveys from disease sites studied for the periods 1992-1994 and 1996-1999 (breast cancer, n = 1,080; prostate cancer, n = 1,149; esophageal cancer, n = 818) were analyzed. The PCS is a National Cancer Institute-funded national survey of randomly selected RT institutions in the United States. Patients with nonmetastatic disease who received RT as definitive or adjuvant therapy were randomly selected from eligible patients at each institution. To determine national estimates, individual patient records were weighted by the relative contribution of each institution and patients within each institution. Data regarding participation in clinical trials were recorded. The factors age, gender, race, type of insurance, and practice type of treating institution (academic or not) were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, only 2.7% of all patients were accrued to clinical protocols. Of these, 57% were enrolled on institutional review board-approved institutional trials, and 43% on National Cancer Institute collaborative group studies. On multivariate analysis, patients treated at academic facilities (p = 0.0001) and white patients (vs. African Americans, p = 0.0002) were significantly more likely to participate in clinical oncology trials. Age, gender, type of cancer, and type of insurance were not predictive.
CONCLUSIONS: Practice type and race significantly influence enrollment onto clinical oncology trials. This suggests that increased communication and education regarding protocols, particularly focusing on physicians in nonacademic settings and minority patients, will be essential to enhance accrual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418963     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

Review 1.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Manning; K Rothkamm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility Test of a Community-Relevant Intervention Designed to Promote African American Participation in Translational, Breast Cancer Disparities Research: Know About Health Options for Women (Know HOW).

Authors:  Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary; Page Moore; Jerome Turner; Leah Dawson; Seongkum Heo; Paul Greene
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Analysis of Factors Affecting Successful Clinical Trial Enrollment in the Context of Three Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Chad Tang; Zhongxing Liao; J Jack Lee; John V Heymach; Stephen G Swisher; James W Welsh; Jianjun Zhang; Steven H Lin; Daniel R Gomez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Welfare implications of learning through solicitation versus diversification in health care.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jonathan E Dowell; Jingsheng Yan; Jennifer R Sayne; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Shiraz I Mishra; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2009-05

7.  Do we reach the patients with the most problems? Baseline data from the WebCan study among survivors of head-and-neck cancer, Denmark.

Authors:  Trille Kjaer; Christoffer Johansen; Elo Andersen; Randi Karlsen; Anni Linnet Nielsen; Kirsten Frederiksen; Mikael Rørth; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Enrollment of patients with lung and colorectal cancers onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Mona N Fouad; Jeannette Y Lee; Paul J Catalano; Thomas M Vogt; Syed Yousuf Zafar; Dee W West; Christian Simon; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; Jane C Weeks; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Benefits of a clinical data warehouse with data mining tools to collect data for a radiotherapy trial.

Authors:  Erik Roelofs; Lucas Persoon; Sebastiaan Nijsten; Wolfgang Wiessler; André Dekker; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes: biological, social, and health system determinants and opportunities for research.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.