Literature DB >> 17412489

Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients.

Guillaume Guichard1, Stéphane Larré, Andrea Gallina, Adi Lazar, Hugo Faucon, Stéphanie Chemama, Yves Allory, Jean-Jacques Patard, Dimitri Vordos, Andras Hoznek, René Yiou, Laurent Salomon, Claude Clément Abbou, Alexandre de la Taille.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 21-sample ultrasound-guided needle biopsy protocol as the initial diagnostic strategy for detection of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2001 and October 2005, 1000 consecutive patients underwent 21-sample needle biopsies under local anesthesia, comprising sextant biopsies, 3 additional posterolateral biopsies in each peripheral zone, 3 biopsies in each transition zone (TZ), and 3 biopsies in the midline peripheral zone. Each prostate core was numbered and analyzed separately. The patients were divided into subgroups according to the result of digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume. We evaluated the cancer detection rate overall and in each subgroup. We compared the results of our biopsy protocol to those from 6-, 12-, and 18-core biopsy protocols by analyzing only those cores from our protocol that would correspond to these biopsy schemes.
RESULTS: Cancer detection rates using 6 biopsy samples (sextant biopsies only), 12 samples (sextant plus lateral biopsies), 18 samples (sextant, lateral, and TZ biopsies), and 21 samples (sextant, lateral, TZ, plus midline biopsies) were 31.7%, 38.7%, 41.5%, and 42.5%, respectively. The 12-sample procedure improved the cancer detection rate by 22% compared with the 6-sample procedure (p=0.0001). The improvement in the diagnostic yield was most marked in patients with a prostate volume > or =55 ml (36.9%), in patients with normal DRE (26.6%), and in patients with PSA<4 (37.5%). The addition of TZ biopsies to a 12-biopsy scheme increased the diagnostic yield by 7.2% overall (p=0.023). Only 10 of 425 (2.3%) patients were diagnosed on the sole basis of midline biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected localized prostate cancer should be offered at least 12 biopsies in the peripheral zone and far lateral peripheral zone (statistically significant). TZ biopsies have to be considered, because these biopsies improve the diagnostic yield. For patients with abnormal DRE and/or PSA> or =20 ng/ml, the 6-biopsy scheme seems sufficient (statistically), but 6 far lateral peripheral zone biopsies as well as the TZ biopsies add little incremental value (not significant). Evidence does not support the use of routine midline peripheral zone needle biopsies in the initial biopsy to enhance the detection of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412489     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  40 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

2.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Incremental value of transition zone and midline apical biopsy at baseline TRUS-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  D M Somford; W Vreuls; T S Jansen; J P van Basten; H Vergunst
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Coagulation of human prostate volumes with MRI-controlled transurethral ultrasound therapy: results in gel phantoms.

Authors:  William Apoutou N'djin; Mathieu Burtnyk; Ilya Kobelevskiy; Stefan Hadjis; Michael Bronskill; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Baris Turkbey; Neil Glossop; Anurag K Singh; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-09

Review 9.  Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; H Ballentine Carter; Paul Schellhammer; Michael S Cookson; Leonard G Gomella; Dean Troyer; Thomas M Wheeler; Steven Schlossberg; David F Penson; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.