Literature DB >> 17411868

Costs, charges, and revenues for hospital diagnostic imaging procedures: differences by modality and hospital characteristics.

Christopher Lee Sistrom1, Niccie L McKay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined financial data reported by Florida hospitals concerning costs, charges, and revenues related to imaging services.
METHODS: Financial reports to the Florida Hospital Uniform Reporting System by all licensed acute care facilities for fiscal year 2002 were used to calculate four financial indices on a per procedure basis. These included charge, net revenue, operating expense (variable cost), and contribution margin. Analysis, stratified by cost center (imaging modality), tested the effects of bed size, ownership, teaching status, and urban or rural status on the four indices.
RESULTS: The mean operating expense and charge per procedure were as follows: computed tomography (CT): $51 and $1565; x-ray and ultrasound: $55 and $410; nuclear medicine (NM): $135 and $1138; and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): $165 and $2048. With all four modalities, for-profit hospitals had higher charges than not-for-profit and public facilities. Excepting NM, however, the difference by ownership disappeared when considering net revenue. Operating expense did not differ by ownership type or bed size.
CONCLUSIONS: Operating expense (variable cost) per procedure is considerably lower for CT than for MRI. Consequently, when diagnostically equivalent, CT is preferable to MRI in terms of costs for hospitals. If the cost structure of nonhospital imaging is at all similar to hospitals, the profit potential for performing CT and MRI seems to be substantial, which has relevance to the issue of imaging self-referral.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411868     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  24 in total

1.  Ultrahigh Frequency Ultrasound Imaging of the Hand: A New Diagnostic Tool for Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Stephen L Viviano; Laurel K Chandler; Jonathan D Keith
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-27

2.  What Does a Shoulder MRI Cost the Consumer?

Authors:  Robert W Westermann; Cameron Schick; Christopher M Graves; Kyle R Duchman; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture.

Authors:  Renata R Almeida; Mohammad Mansouri; David K Tso; Anne H Johnson; Michael H Lev; Ajay K Singh; Efren J Flores
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06

4.  A Gastrointestinal PCR Panel Improves Clinical Management and Lowers Health Care Costs.

Authors:  Stacy G Beal; Elizabeth E Tremblay; Steven Toffel; Lymaries Velez; Kenneth H Rand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A highly sensitive x-ray imaging modality for hepatocellular carcinoma detection in vitro.

Authors:  Danielle Rand; Edward G Walsh; Zoltan Derdak; Jack R Wands; Christoph Rose-Petruck
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Obtaining Imaging Cost and Quality Information in Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Patient Experience.

Authors:  Chris A Anthony; Edward O Rojas; Natalie Glass; Robert W Westermann; John C Clohisy; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

Review 7.  Imaging Pediatric Vascular Lesions.

Authors:  Tuyet A Nguyen; Andrew C Krakowski; John H Naheedy; Peter G Kruk; Sheila Fallon Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-12

8.  Evidence-Based Physical Examination for the Diagnosis of Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Dakkak; Michael K Krill; Matthew L Krill; Benedict Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; Charlotte Schneider; Sophia Kronthaler; Florian T Gassert; Christof Böhm; Daniela Pfeiffer; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Markus Wurm; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Economics of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Nathalie J Bureau; Daniela Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.