Literature DB >> 17410528

Factors associated with breast cancer-specific distress in younger women participating in a family history mammography screening programme.

B J Henderson1, S Tyndel, K Brain, A Clements, C Bankhead, J Austoker, E Watson, Stephen Duffy, Gareth Evans, Hilary Fielder, Jonathon Gray, James Mackay, Douglas Macmillan.   

Abstract

This multi-centre study examined factors associated with breast cancer-specific distress in 2321 women under 50 who are on a mammographic screening programme on account of their family history. Women were recruited from 21 UK centres, and completed a questionnaire one month before their screening appointment. The transactional theory of stress, appraisal, and coping provided the theoretical framework for the study. Factors measured included screening history, family history, perceived risk, cognitive appraisals, coping, optimism, and cancer worry. The findings indicate that the majority of women appraise their family history as being relevant and somewhat threatening to personal well-being, but something they can deal with emotionally. Acceptance was the most commonly used coping strategy. Hierarchical regression analysis identified that the factors most significantly associated with distress were an appraisal of high relevance and threat, increased risk perception, low dispositional optimism, and the use of both avoidant and task-orientated coping strategies. Women with children and those with relatives who have died from breast cancer were also more distressed. To conclude, most women appraised their situation positively but there is a potential profile of risk factors which may help clinicians identify those women who need extra psychological support as they progress through screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17410528     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  10 in total

1.  French women's breast self-examination practices with time after undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

Authors:  C Maheu; T Apostolidis; A Petri-Cal; E Mouret-Fourme; M Gauthier-Villars; C Lasset; P Berthet; J-P Fricker; O Caron; E Luporsi; L Gladieff; C Noguès; C Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara A Davis; Robert Yale
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

3.  Objective and subjective breast cancer risk: relationships with natural killer cell activity and psychological distress in healthy women.

Authors:  Na-Jin Park; Duck-Hee Kang; Michael T Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Genetic risk, perceived risk, and cancer worry in daughters of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Joann N Bodurtha; Donna McClish; Diane Baer Wilson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Living my family's story: identifying the lived experience in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Robin M Lally; Marc T Kiviniemi; Christine Murekeyisoni; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  CT scan screening is associated with increased distress among subjects of the APExS.

Authors:  Christophe Paris; Marion Maurel; Amandine Luc; Audrey Stoufflet; Jean-Claude Pairon; Marc Letourneux
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Biopsychological stress factors in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lari Wenzel; Kathyrn Osann; Jenny Lester; Raluca Kurz; Susie Hsieh; Edward L Nelson; Beth Karlan
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

8.  Cognitive appraisals, coping and depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Silvia M Bigatti; Jennifer L Steiner; Kathy D Miller
Journal:  Stress Health       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Psychological functioning in persons considering genetic counseling and testing for Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Susan K Peterson; Rebecca D Pentz; Salma K Marani; Patricia A Ward; Amie M Blanco; Denise LaRue; Kristen Vogel; Tamara Solomon; Louise C Strong
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.955

10.  Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk.

Authors:  S Tyndel; A Clements; C Bankhead; B J Henderson; K Brain; E Watson; J Austoker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.