Literature DB >> 17409479

Thin microelectrodes reduce GFAP expression in the implant site in rodent somatosensory cortex.

Paula Stice1, Aaron Gilletti, Alyssa Panitch, Jit Muthuswamy.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that neural implants with reduced cross-sectional areas will have less glial scarring associated with implantation injury in long-term experiments. In this study, we implanted nine adult rats with two different implants of 12 microm (n = 6), and 25 microm (n = 6) diameters (cross-sectional areas of 68 microm(2), 232 microm(2) respectively) and the expression of glial fibrilliary acidic protein (GFAP) was assessed after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of implantation. In order to facilitate implantation, the 12 microm diameter implants were coated with poly-glycolic acid (PGA), a biodegradable polymer that degraded within minutes of implantation. In n = 3 animals, 25 microm diameter implants also coated with PGA were implanted and assessed for GFAP expression at the end of 4 weeks of implantation. Statistical analysis of the GFAP expression around the different implants demonstrated that after 2 weeks of implantation there is no statistically significant difference in GFAP expression between the 12 microm and the 25 microm diameter implants. However, after 4 weeks of implantation the implant site of 12 microm diameter implants exhibited a statistically significant reduction in GFAP expression when compared to the implant sites of the 25 microm diameter implants (both with and without the PGA coating). We conclude that in neural implants that are tethered to the skull, implant cross-sectional areas of 68 microm(2) and smaller could lead to a reduced glial scarring under chronic conditions. Future studies with longer implant durations can confirm if this observation remains consistent beyond 4 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409479     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  33 in total

1.  Intracranial electrode implantation produces regional neuroinflammation and memory deficits in rats.

Authors:  Yafit Kuttner Hirshler; Uri Polat; Anat Biegon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Pouria Fattahi; Guang Yang; Gloria Kim; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Chronic in vivo stability assessment of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Huanan Zhang; Matthew T Robbins; Justin B Nofar; Shaun P Marshall; Michael J Kobylarek; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Zwitterionic polymer/polydopamine coating reduce acute inflammatory tissue responses to neural implants.

Authors:  Asiyeh Golabchi; Bingchen Wu; Bin Cao; Christopher J Bettinger; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  The fate of ultrafast degrading polymeric implants in the brain.

Authors:  Dan Y Lewitus; Karen L Smith; William Shain; Durgadas Bolikal; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Variability of acute extracellular action potential measurements with multisite silicon probes.

Authors:  Kimberly M Scott; Jiangang Du; Henry A Lester; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 8.  Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications.

Authors:  Mehdi Jorfi; John L Skousen; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Intracranial EEG fluctuates over months after implanting electrodes in human brain.

Authors:  Hoameng Ung; Steven N Baldassano; Hank Bink; Abba M Krieger; Shawniqua Williams; Flavia Vitale; Chengyuan Wu; Dean Freestone; Ewan Nurse; Kent Leyde; Kathryn A Davis; Mark Cook; Brian Litt
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Cristina Marin; Eduardo Fernández
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.