Literature DB >> 17407899

Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Christophe Micheyl1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Pitch discrimination interference (PDI) refers to an impairment in the ability to discriminate changes in the fundamental frequency (F0) of a target harmonic complex, caused by another harmonic complex (the interferer) presented simultaneously in a remote spectral region. So far, PDI has been demonstrated for target complexes filtered into a higher spectral region than the interferer and containing no peripherally resolved harmonics in their passband. Here, it is shown that PDI also occurs when the target harmonic complex contains resolved harmonics in its passband (experiment 1). PDI was also observed when the target was filtered into a lower spectral region than that of the interferer (experiment 2), revealing that differences in relative harmonic dominance and pitch salience between the simultaneous target and the interferer, as confirmed using pitch matches (experiment 3), do not entirely explain PDI. When the target was in the higher spectral region, and the F0 separation between the target and the interferer was around 7% or 10%, dramatic PDI effects were observed despite the relatively large FO separation between the two sequential targets (14%-20%). Overall, the results suggest that PDI is more general than previously thought, and is not limited to targets consisting only of unresolved harmonics.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407899     DOI: 10.1121/1.2431334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Limiting unwanted cues via random rove applied to the yes-no and multiple-alternative forced choice paradigms.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

4.  Harmonic template neurons in primate auditory cortex underlying complex sound processing.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Harmonic pitch: dependence on resolved partials, spectral edges, and combination tones.

Authors:  Huanping Dai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Further examination of pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Combining information across frequency regions in fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.