Literature DB >> 19206880

Further examination of pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Hedwig E Gockel1, Robert P Carlyon, Christopher J Plack.   

Abstract

Pitch discrimination interference (PDI) is an impairment in fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination between two sequentially presented complex (target) tones produced by another complex tone (the interferer) that is filtered into a remote spectral frequency region. Micheyl and Oxenham [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1621-1631 (2007)] reported a modest PDI for target tones and interferers both containing resolved harmonics when the F0 difference between the two target tones (DeltaF0) was small. When the interferer was in a lower spectral region than the target, a much larger PDI was observed when DeltaF0 was large (14%-20%), and, under these conditions, performance in the presence of an interferer was worse than at smaller DeltaF0s. The present study replicated the occurrence of PDI for complex tones containing resolved harmonics for small DeltaF0s. In contrast to Micheyl and Oxenham's findings, performance in the presence of an interferer always increased monotonically with increasing DeltaF0. However, when the interferer was in a lower spectral region than the target (and not vice versa), some subjects needed verbal instructions or modified stimuli to choose the correct cue, indicating an asymmetry in spontaneous obviousness of the correct listening cue across conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19206880      PMCID: PMC2700645          DOI: 10.1121/1.3056568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Human pitch perception is reflected in the timing of stimulus-related cortical activity.

Authors:  A D Patel; E Balaban
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms.

Authors:  Hedwig Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of pitch pulse asynchrony.

Authors:  Hedwig Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference.

Authors:  Peter Schneider; Vanessa Sluming; Neil Roberts; Michael Scherg; Rainer Goebel; Hans J Specht; H Günter Dosch; Stefan Bleeck; Christoph Stippich; André Rupp
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch perception: a difference between right- and left-handed listeners.

Authors:  V Laguitton; L Demany; C Semal; C Liégeois-Chauvel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  A unitary model of pitch perception.

Authors:  R Meddis; L O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of duration on the frequency discrimination of individual partials in a complex tone and on the discrimination of fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

3.  Pitch discrimination interference between binaural and monaural or diotic pitches.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Combining information across frequency regions in fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.