Literature DB >> 12616167

Reposition sense of lumbar curvature with flexed and asymmetric lifting postures.

Sara E Wilson1, Kevin P Granata.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Reposition sense of lumbar curvature was assessed as a function of trunk flexion, trunk asymmetry, and target lumbar curvature using a repeated-measures design and an active-active proprioception paradigm.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the research were to measure the ability of the subjects to sense and control the lumbar curvature in different lifting postures and to see if error in the lumbar curvature would increase in high-risk postures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The risk of low back disorders (LBDs) is related to trunk posture, with greater risk reported in flexed and asymmetric trunk positions. Spinal posture, including trunk position and lumbar lordosis, influences spinal stability. Hence, the ability to accurately sense and control spinal curvature may be an important factor in the control of LBD risk.
METHODS: Eleven subjects were trained to assume specified lumbar curvatures using visual feedback. The ability of the subjects to reproduce this curvature without feedback was then assessed. This procedure was repeated for different trunk postures, including flexion and asymmetry, and with different target lumbar curvatures.
RESULTS: These measurements demonstrated reposition error was increased in flexed trunk positions but was unchanged with trunk asymmetry. This increase in reposition error with flexion was diminished when the target posture and lumbar curvature were highly flexed and kyphotic.
CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that it may be difficult to control spinal curvature in flexed positions, leading to an increased risk of injury. For jobs in which flexed working postures are unavoidable, therefore, it is important to minimize potentially unstable events such as slipping or shifting loads to avoid injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12616167      PMCID: PMC1790962          DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048674.75474.C4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Spinal position sense is independent of the magnitude of movement.

Authors:  A Swinkels; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Trunk positioning accuracy in children 7-18 years old.

Authors:  J A Ashton-Miller; K M McGlashen; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Low back exercises: evidence for improving exercise regimens.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-07

4.  The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain.

Authors:  K P Gill; M J Callaghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture.

Authors:  J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; A Khachatryan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Joint position sense and rehabilitation in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  N D Carter; T R Jenkinson; D Wilson; D W Jones; A S Torode
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Proprioception at the ankle: the effect of anaesthetic blockade of ligament receptors.

Authors:  L Konradsen; J B Ravn; A I Sørensen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-05

8.  Transfer of loads between lumbar tissues during the flexion-relaxation phenomenon.

Authors:  S M McGill; V Kippers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson; W G Allread; S L Rajulu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Ankle sensorimotor control and eversion strength after acute ankle inversion injuries.

Authors:  L Konradsen; S Olesen; H M Hansen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Plane of vertebral movement eliciting muscle lengthening history in the low back influences the decrease in muscle spindle responsiveness of the cat.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Lengthening but not shortening history of paraspinal muscle spindles in the low back alters their dynamic sensitivity.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Lumbar-pelvic range and coordination during lifting tasks.

Authors:  A Maduri; B L Pearson; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Lumbar position sense with extreme lumbar angle.

Authors:  A Maduri; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Effect of spinal manipulation on the development of history-dependent responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

6.  Lumbar repositioning accuracy as a measure of proprioception in patients with back dysfunction and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ehab E Georgy
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-11-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.