Literature DB >> 17406813

Safety and efficacy of aspartame-based liquid versus sucrose-based liquids used for dilution in oral sodium phosphate solutions for colonoscopy preparations.

Sherman M Chamberlain1, J Carter Balart, Kostas Sideridis, Jefrey Salek, Subbaramiah Sridhar, William O Thompson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether an oral sodium phosphate solution (OSPS) mixed with aspartame-based clear liquids as the diluent would yield improved colon cleansing results compared to an OSPS mixed with sucrose-based liquids as the diluent. Fifty-one patients undergoing colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into two groups to receive different OSPS colonoscopy preparations, with sucrose-based or aspartame-based liquids used as diluents. The primary end point was the quality of the colonoscopy preparation and secondary end points were serum electrolytes before and after preparations. No significant difference in colonoscopy preparation quality was seen between the two OSPS diluent groups (Mantel-Haenzel chi (2) = 0.795, P = 0.484). There were no significant differences in mean electrolyte shifts of sodium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), or BUN/Cr ratios between the two groups. There was a statistically significant increase in serum phosphorous in the aspartame-based group compared to the sucrose-based diluent group (P = 0.021). In conclusion, there was no clinically detectable difference in colonoscopy preparation quality between the two OSPS diluent groups. This study suggests that passive fluid transport by aquaporins may well be the major mediator of fluid shifts in the study subjects. This result suggests the potential importance of aquaporins and minimizes the importance of sodium glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in fluid and electrolyte transport in the human gastrointestinal tract. Aspartame or its constituent amino acids may enhance phosphate absorption across the human small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17406813     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-9790-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

Review 1.  Water transport by epithelia of the digestive tract.

Authors:  Anatoly I Masyuk; Raul A Marinelli; Nicholas F LaRusso
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Fatal hyperphosphatemia from a phosphosoda bowel preparation.

Authors:  Nadeem Ullah; Robert Yeh; Murray Ehrinpreis
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  The glucose transporter family: structure, function and tissue-specific expression.

Authors:  G W Gould; G D Holman
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  NaPi-mediated transcellular permeation is the dominant route in intestinal inorganic phosphate absorption in rats.

Authors:  Nobuaki Eto; Mikio Tomita; Masahiro Hayashi
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.614

6.  A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.

Authors:  S J Vanner; P H MacDonald; W G Paterson; R S Prentice; L R Da Costa; I T Beck
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate.

Authors:  David H Balaban; Byrd S Leavell; Michael J Oblinger; William O Thompson; Nancy D Bolton; Daniel J Pambianco
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Prospective, randomized trial comparing a new sodium phosphate-bisacodyl regimen with conventional PEG-ES lavage for outpatient colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  S A Afridi; J S Barthel; P D King; J J Pineda; J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Metabolism of aspartame by human and pig intestinal microvillar peptidases.

Authors:  N M Hooper; R J Hesp; S Tieku
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Mobility of ions, sugar, and water in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes expressing Na(+)-coupled sugar transporters (SGLT1).

Authors:  Thomas Zeuthen; Emil Zeuthen; Dan A Klaerke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  1 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.