Literature DB >> 17404368

Intensive dose-dense compared with high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk operable breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup study 9623.

Halle C F Moore1, Stephanie J Green, Julie R Gralow, Scott I Bearman, Danika Lew, William E Barlow, Clifford Hudis, Antonio C Wolff, James N Ingle, Helen K Chew, Anthony D Elias, Robert B Livingston, Silvana Martino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)/Intergroup study 9623 was undertaken to compare treatment with an anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS) with a modern dose-dense dose-escalated (nonstandard) regimen including both an anthracycline and a taxane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants in this phase III randomized study had operable breast cancer involving four or more axillary lymph nodes and had completed mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by HDC with AHPCS or to receive sequential dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide. The primary end point of this study was disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS: Among 536 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the two arms for DFS or overall survival (OS). Estimated five-year DFS was 80% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) for dose-dense therapy and 75% (95% CI, 69% to 80%) for transplantation. Estimated 5-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 84% to 92%) for dose-dense therapy and 84% (95% CI, 79% to 88%) for transplantation.
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that transplantation was superior to dose-dense dose-escalated therapy. Transplantation was associated with an increase in toxicity and a possibly inferior outcome, although the hazard ratios were not significantly different from 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404368     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Long-term survival after high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell rescue for high-risk, locally advanced/inflammatory, and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A VanderWalde; W Ye; P Frankel; D Asuncion; L Leong; T Luu; R Morgan; P Twardowski; M Koczywas; R Pezner; I B Paz; K Margolin; J Wong; J H Doroshow; S Forman; S Shibata; G Somlo
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Secondary malignancies following high dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Vaxman; R Ram; A Gafter-Gvili; L Vidal; M Yeshurun; M Lahav; O Shpilberg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Naoto T Ueno; Marcella M Johnson; Xiudong Lei; Jean Caputo; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; William P Peters; Robert C Leonard; William E Barlow; Martin S Tallman; Jonas Bergh; Ulrike A Nitz; Alessandro M Gianni; Russell L Basser; Axel R Zander; R Charles Coombes; Henri Roché; Yutaka Tokuda; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John P Crown; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Marco Bregni; Taner Demirer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Breast cancer (non-metastatic).

Authors:  Justin Stebbing; Geoff Delaney; Alastair Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-02-08

6.  Metronomic chemotherapy enhances antitumor effects of cancer vaccine by depleting regulatory T lymphocytes and inhibiting tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Chi-An Chen; Chih-Ming Ho; Ming-Cheng Chang; Wei-Zun Sun; Yu-Li Chen; Ying-Cheng Chiang; Ming-Hong Syu; Chang-Yao Hsieh; Wen-Fang Cheng
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Is Higher Efficacy Always at the Price of More Side Effects during Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Brigitte Mlineritsch
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.

Authors:  Cindy Farquhar; Jane Marjoribanks; Anne Lethaby; Maimoona Azhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-20

9.  Strategies to improve long-term outcome in stage IIIB inflammatory breast cancer: multimodality treatment including dose-intensive induction and high-dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  Claude Sportès; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Juan Gea-Banacloche; David N Danforth; Daniele N Avila; Kelly E Bryant; Michael C Krumlauf; Daniel H Fowler; Steven Pavletic; Nancy M Hardy; Michael R Bishop; Ronald E Gress
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Highly favorable outcome in BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  L Boudin; A Gonçalves; R Sabatier; J Moretta; P Sfumato; P Asseeva; D Livon; F Bertucci; J-M Extra; C Tarpin; G Houvenaeghel; E Lambaudie; A Tallet; M Resbeut; H Sobol; E Charafe-Jauffret; B Calmels; C Lemarie; J-M Boher; P Viens; F Eisinger; C Chabannon
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.