INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer affects at least 1 in 10 women in the UK, but most present with primary operable disease, which has an 80% 5-year survival rate overall. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ? What are the effects of treatments for primary operable breast cancer? What are the effects of interventions in locally advanced breast cancer (stage 3B)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 83 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: adding chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil and/or anthracycline and/or taxane-based regimens), or hormonal treatment to radiotherapy; adjuvant treatments (aromatase inhibitors, adjuvant anthracycline regimens, tamoxifen); axillary clearance; axillary dissection plus sentinel node dissection; axillary radiotherapy; axillary sampling; combined chemotherapy plus tamoxifen; chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab); extensive surgery; high-dose chemotherapy; hormonal treatment; less extensive mastectomy; less than whole-breast radiotherapy plus breast-conserving surgery; multimodal treatment; ovarian ablation; primary chemotherapy; prolonged adjuvant combination chemotherapy; radiotherapy (after breast-conserving surgery, after mastectomy, plus tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery, to the internal mammary chain, and to the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa, and total nodal radiotherapy); sentinel node biopsy; and standard chemotherapy regimens.
INTRODUCTION:Breast cancer affects at least 1 in 10 women in the UK, but most present with primary operable disease, which has an 80% 5-year survival rate overall. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ? What are the effects of treatments for primary operable breast cancer? What are the effects of interventions in locally advanced breast cancer (stage 3B)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 83 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: adding chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil and/or anthracycline and/or taxane-based regimens), or hormonal treatment to radiotherapy; adjuvant treatments (aromatase inhibitors, adjuvant anthracycline regimens, tamoxifen); axillary clearance; axillary dissection plus sentinel node dissection; axillary radiotherapy; axillary sampling; combined chemotherapy plus tamoxifen; chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab); extensive surgery; high-dose chemotherapy; hormonal treatment; less extensive mastectomy; less than whole-breast radiotherapy plus breast-conserving surgery; multimodal treatment; ovarian ablation; primary chemotherapy; prolonged adjuvant combination chemotherapy; radiotherapy (after breast-conserving surgery, after mastectomy, plus tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery, to the internal mammary chain, and to the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa, and total nodal radiotherapy); sentinel node biopsy; and standard chemotherapy regimens.
Authors: David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Barbara J Miller; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh M C Scarth; Denise M Mammolito; David R McCready; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Molin Wang; Silvana Martino; Vicky Jones; Edith A Perez; Tom Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; George W Sledge; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Diana Crivellari; Zhuoxin Sun; Alan S Coates; Karen N Price; Beat Thürlimann; Henning Mouridsen; Louis Mauriac; John F Forbes; Robert J Paridaens; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Lucia Del Mastro; Laurence Gladieff; Manuela Rabaglio; Ian E Smith; Jacquie H Chirgwin; Aron Goldhirsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Birgitte B Rasmussen; Meredith M Regan; Anne E Lykkesfeldt; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Barbara Del Curto; Katrine L Henriksen; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Karen N Price; Eliane Méry; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Stephen Braye; Hans J Altermatt; Richard D Gelber; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Aron Goldhirsch; Barry A Gusterson; Beat Thürlimann; Alan S Coates; Giuseppe Viale Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: John F Forbes; Jack Cuzick; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Jeffrey S Tobias; Michael Baum Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: M Clarke; A S Coates; S C Darby; C Davies; R D Gelber; J Godwin; A Goldhirsch; R Gray; R Peto; K I Pritchard; W C Wood Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-05 Impact factor: 79.321