Literature DB >> 17397062

Characterization of interfacial solvent in protein complexes and contribution of wet spots to the interface description.

Joan Teyra1, M T Pisabarro.   

Abstract

Water networks in protein interfaces can complement direct interactions contributing significantly to molecular recognition, function, and stability of protein association. Thus, water can be seen as an extension or addition of protein structural features, which may add plenty of information to protein interfacial definition. However, solvent is frequently neglected in protein interaction studies. Analysis of the interfacial information contained in the PDB is essential to achieve more accurate descriptions of protein interfaces. With this aim, we have used the SCOWLP database (http://www.scowlp.org) and applied computational geometry methods to extract and analyze interfacial information of a high-resolution nonredundant dataset of 176 protein complexes containing obligate and transient interfaces. We have identified all interfacial residues and characterized them in terms of temperature factors, secondary structure, residue composition, and pairing preferences to understand their contribution to the interface description. We have paid special attention to water-bridged residues; focusing on those that interact only mediated by a water molecule called wet spots. Our results show that 40.1% of the interfacial residues are interacting through water and that wet spots represent a 14.5% of the total, emphasizing the importance of the inclusion of solvent in protein interaction studies, and the contribution of wet spots to interfacial description. Wet spots present similar characteristics to residues binding buried water molecules in the core or cavities of proteins; being preferably located in nonregular secondary structures and establishing hydrogen bonds by their main-chains. We observe that obligate and transient interfaces present a comparable amount of solvent. Moreover, the role of solvent in both complex types differs according to the different nature of their interfaces. The information obtained in our studies will assist in the process of accomplishing more accurate descriptions of protein interfaces and may be helpful to improve comparison of protein family interfaces, to facilitate rational ligand design, and to guide protein docking. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397062     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  17 in total

1.  Minimizing frustration by folding in an aqueous environment.

Authors:  Carla Mattos; A Clay Clark
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  Knitting and untying the protein network: modulation of protein ensembles as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Susana Gordo; Ernest Giralt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces.

Authors:  Nurcan Tuncbag; Gozde Kar; Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Role of interfacial water molecules in proline-rich ligand recognition by the Src homology 3 domain of Abl.

Authors:  Andres Palencia; Ana Camara-Artigas; M Teresa Pisabarro; Jose C Martinez; Irene Luque
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Water-mediated ionic interactions in protein structures.

Authors:  R Sabarinathan; K Aishwarya; R Sarani; M Kirti Vaishnavi; K Sekar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Alternative protein-protein interfaces are frequent exceptions.

Authors:  Tobias Hamp; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Bound water at protein-protein interfaces: partners, roles and hydrophobic bubbles as a conserved motif.

Authors:  Mostafa H Ahmed; Francesca Spyrakis; Pietro Cozzini; Parijat K Tripathi; Andrea Mozzarelli; J Neel Scarsdale; Martin A Safo; Glen E Kellogg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deciphering the shape and deformation of secondary structures through local conformation analysis.

Authors:  Julie Baussand; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02-01

9.  SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds.

Authors:  Joan Teyra; Sergey A Samsonov; Sven Schreiber; M Teresa Pisabarro
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  InterEvol database: exploring the structure and evolution of protein complex interfaces.

Authors:  Guilhem Faure; Jessica Andreani; Raphaël Guerois
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.