Literature DB >> 1739559

Reported significant observations during anaesthesia: a prospective analysis over an 18-month period.

V Chopra1, J G Bovill, J Spierdijk, F Koornneef.   

Abstract

We describe a prospective analysis, in one hospital, of reported significant observations involving unsafe practices and working conditions during anaesthesia. Of the 549 significant observations reported voluntarily during a period of 18 months, 82% involved occurrences which were considered preventable and 27% could have been fatal if they had not been recognized and corrected. Ninety-three percent of incidents did not lead to a negative outcome. Human error was responsible for 411 (75%) reports. Lack of vigilance and failure to check were the most frequently reported factors associated with human error. Significant observations involving errors in drugs administration were the most frequent. Forty-five percent of all reported significant observations were made during maintenance of anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739559     DOI: 10.1093/bja/68.1.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; S Undre; K Moorthy; C Vincent; A Darzi
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

4.  Understanding ourselves in the healthcare system: psychological insights.

Authors:  J Williamson; P Barach
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

5.  Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

6.  Building an efficient surgical team using a bench model simulation: construct validity of the Legacy Inanimate System for Endoscopic Team Training (LISETT).

Authors:  B Zheng; P M Denk; D V Martinec; P Gatta; M H Whiteford; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Introduction of "international syringe labelling" in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  J Shannon; S O'Riain
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Video analysis of anticipatory movements performed by surgeons during laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sally Adams; Vikas Pandey; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Investigating interpersonal competencies of cardiac surgery teams.

Authors:  Mark Fleming; Steven Smith; Jason Slaunwhite; John Sullivan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.