Literature DB >> 17395217

Radiation induced bystander signals are independent of DNA damage and DNA repair capacity of the irradiated cells.

Genro Kashino1, Keiji Suzuki, Naoki Matsuda, Seiji Kodama, Koji Ono, Masami Watanabe, Kevin M Prise.   

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that irradiated cells produce signals, which interact with non-exposed cells in the same population. Here, we analysed the mechanism for bystander signal arising in wild-type CHO cells and repair deficient varients, focussing on the relationship between DNA repair capacity and bystander signal arising in irradiated cells. In order to investigate the bystander effect, we carried out medium transfer experiments after X-irradiation where micronuclei were scored in non-targeted DSB repair deficient xrs5 cells. When conditioned medium from irradiated cells was transferred to unirradiated xrs5 cells, the level of induction was independent of whether the medium came from irradiated wild-type, ssb or dsb repair deficient cells. This result suggests that the activation of a bystander signal is independent of the DNA repair capacity of the irradiated cells. Also, pre-treatment of the irradiated cells with 0.5% DMSO, which suppresses micronuclei induction in CHO but not in xrs5 cells, suppressed bystander effects completely in both conditioned media, suggesting that DMSO is effective for suppression of bystander signal arising independently of DNA damage in irradiated cells. Overall the work presented here adds to the understanding that it is the repair phenotype of the cells receiving bystander signals, which determines overall response rather than that of the cell producing the bystander signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395217      PMCID: PMC3004241          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  18 in total

1.  Induction of radioresistance by a nitric oxide-mediated bystander effect.

Authors:  H Matsumoto; S Hayashi; M Hatashita; K Ohnishi; H Shioura; T Ohtsubo; R Kitai; T Ohnishi; E Kano
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; K D Held; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Low dose, low-LET ionizing radiation-induced radioadaptation and associated early responses in unirradiated cells.

Authors:  Rashi Iyer; Bruce E Lehnert
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Melvyn Folkard; Barry D Michael; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells.

Authors:  Genro Kashino; Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Melvyn Folkard; Borivoj Vojnovic; Barry D Michael; Keiji Suzuki; Seiji Kodama; Masami Watanabe
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Nitric oxide-mediated bystander effect induced by heavy-ions in human salivary gland tumour cells.

Authors:  C Shao; Y Furusawa; M Aoki; H Matsumoto; K Ando
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Nitric oxide-mediated signaling in the bystander response of individually targeted glioma cells.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Victoria Stewart; Melvyn Folkard; Barry D Michael; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Oxidative metabolism modulates signal transduction and micronucleus formation in bystander cells from alpha-particle-irradiated normal human fibroblast cultures.

Authors:  Edouard I Azzam; Sonia M De Toledo; Douglas R Spitz; John B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Role of gap junctional intercellular communication in radiation-induced bystander effects in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Chunlin Shao; Yoshiya Furusawa; Mizuho Aoki; Koichi Ando
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  New molecular targets in radiotherapy: DNA damage signalling and repair in targeted and non-targeted cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  Radiation-induced bystander effects in cultured human stem cells.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect: Loss of Radioprotective Capacity of Rosmarinic Acid In Vivo and In Vitro.

Authors:  Amparo Olivares; Miguel Alcaraz-Saura; Daniel Gyingiri Achel; Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre; Miguel Alcaraz
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Biological complexities in radiation carcinogenesis and cancer radiotherapy: impact of new biological paradigms.

Authors:  Hossein Mozdarani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.