Literature DB >> 17393455

Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys.

Yaping Feng1, Andrzej Kloczkowski, Robert L Jernigan.   

Abstract

Two-body inter-residue contact potentials for proteins have often been extracted and extensively used for threading. Here, we have developed a new scheme to derive four-body contact potentials as a way to consider protein interactions in a more cooperative model. We use several datasets of protein native structures to demonstrate that around 500 chains are sufficient to provide a good estimate of these four-body contact potentials by obtaining convergent threading results. We also have deliberately chosen two sets of protein native structures differing in resolution, one with all chains' resolution better than 1.5 A and the other with 94.2% of the structures having a resolution worse than 1.5 A to investigate whether potentials from well-refined protein datasets perform better in threading. However, potentials from well-refined proteins did not generate statistically significant better threading results. Our four-body contact potentials can discriminate well between native structures and partially unfolded or deliberately misfolded structures. Compared with another set of four-body contact potentials derived by using a Delaunay tessellation algorithm, our four-body contact potentials appear to offer a better characterization of the interactions between backbones and side chains and provide better threading results, somewhat complementary to those found using other potentials. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17393455     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  31 in total

1.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The energy profiles of atomic conformational transition intermediates of adenylate kinase.

Authors:  Yaping Feng; Lei Yang; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-11-15

Review 5.  Designing specific protein-protein interactions using computation, experimental library screening, or integrated methods.

Authors:  T Scott Chen; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Amino acid interaction preferences in proteins.

Authors:  Anupam Nath Jha; Saraswathi Vishveshwara; Jayanth R Banavar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A coarse-grained potential for fold recognition and molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Peter Májek; Ron Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-09

8.  PRTAD: a database for protein residue torsion angle distributions.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Sun; Wu Di; Robert Jernigan; Zhijun Wu
Journal:  Int J Data Min Bioinform       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.667

9.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Discriminating the native structure from decoys using scoring functions based on the residue packing in globular proteins.

Authors:  Ranjit Prasad Bahadur; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.