Literature DB >> 20073083

Amino acid interaction preferences in proteins.

Anupam Nath Jha1, Saraswathi Vishveshwara, Jayanth R Banavar.   

Abstract

Understanding the key factors that influence the interaction preferences of amino acids in the folding of proteins have remained a challenge. Here we present a knowledge-based approach for determining the effective interactions between amino acids based on amino acid type, their secondary structure, and the contact based environment that they find themselves in the native state structure as measured by their number of neighbors. We find that the optimal information is approximately encoded in a 60 x 60 matrix describing the 20 types of amino acids in three distinct secondary structures (helix, beta strand, and loop). We carry out a clustering scheme to understand the similarity between these interactions and to elucidate a nonredundant set. We demonstrate that the inferred energy parameters can be used for assessing the fit of a given sequence into a putative native state structure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20073083      PMCID: PMC2866284          DOI: 10.1002/pro.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  50 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques.

Authors:  C Micheletti; F Seno; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-02-15

3.  On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials.

Authors:  D Tobi; G Shafran; N Linial; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

4.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

5.  Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Side-chain clusters in protein structures and their role in protein folding.

Authors:  J Heringa; P Argos
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Refined models for computer simulation of protein folding. Applications to the study of conserved secondary structure and flexible hinge points during the folding of pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.

Authors:  B Robson; D J Osguthorpe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1979-07-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Residue contact-count potentials are as effective as residue-residue contact-type potentials for ranking protein decoys.

Authors:  Dan M Bolser; Ioannis Filippis; Henning Stehr; Jose Duarte; Michael Lappe
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-12-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  An amino acid code to define a protein's tertiary packing surface.

Authors:  Keith J Fraga; Hyun Joo; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Prediction of functionally important residues in globular proteins from unusual central distances of amino acids.

Authors:  Marek Kochańczyk
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2011-09-18

3.  Structural motifs in protein cores and at protein-protein interfaces are different.

Authors:  Anna Hadarovich; Devlina Chakravarty; Alexander V Tuzikov; Nir Ben-Tal; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Protein docking with predicted constraints.

Authors:  Ludwig Krippahl; Pedro Barahona
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.405

5.  The relationship between relative solvent accessible surface area (rASA) and irregular structures in protean segments (ProSs).

Authors:  Divya Shaji
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  Identification and analysis of structurally critical fragments in HopS2.

Authors:  Sapna M Borah; Anupam Nath Jha
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Predicting clinical benefit of immunotherapy by antigenic or functional mutations affecting tumour immunogenicity.

Authors:  Kwoneel Kim; Hong Sook Kim; Jeong Yeon Kim; Hyunchul Jung; Jong-Mu Sun; Jin Seok Ahn; Myung-Ju Ahn; Keunchil Park; Se-Hoon Lee; Jung Kyoon Choi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  A single arm phase Ib/II trial of first-line pembrolizumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy for advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong-Kun Lee; Sun Young Rha; Hyo Song Kim; Minkyu Jung; Beodeul Kang; Jingmin Che; Woo Sun Kwon; Sejung Park; Woo Kyun Bae; Dong-Hoe Koo; Su-Jin Shin; Hyunki Kim; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Dae Young Zang; Sang Kil Lee; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Cheol Chung
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Scale-free behaviour of amino acid pair interactions in folded proteins.

Authors:  Steffen B Petersen; Maria Teresa Neves-Petersen; Svend B Henriksen; Rasmus J Mortensen; Henrik M Geertz-Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Circles within circles: crosstalk between protein Ser/Thr/Tyr-phosphorylation and Met oxidation.

Authors:  R Rao; Dong Xu; Jay J Thelen; Ján A Miernyk
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.