Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cytokine at the interface between neurobiology and immunology, is mainly mediated through JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway. Evidence suggested LIF is related to the higher expression of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) in asthma. In this study, the immunohistochemistry stain showed the expressions of NK-1R, LIF, p-STAT3, and p-ERK1/2 in the lung tissues of allergic rats were increased compared with the controls, and the main positive cell type was airway epithelial cell. Normal human bronchial epithelial cells were treated with LIF in the presence or absence of AG490 (JAK2 inhibitor), PD98059 (MEK inhibitor), and the siRNA against STAT3. Western blot and RT-PCR indicated that LIF induced the expression of NK-1R, which was inhibited by the inhibitors mentioned above. No significant interaction was found between JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway. In summary, bronchial epithelial cell changes in asthma are induced by LIF which promotes the expression of NK-1R, and JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway may participate in this process.
Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cytokine at the interface between neurobiology and immunology, is mainly mediated through JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway. Evidence suggested LIF is related to the higher expression of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) in asthma. In this study, the immunohistochemistry stain showed the expressions of NK-1R, LIF, p-STAT3, and p-ERK1/2 in the lung tissues of allergic rats were increased compared with the controls, and the main positive cell type was airway epithelial cell. Normal human bronchial epithelial cells were treated with LIF in the presence or absence of AG490 (JAK2 inhibitor), PD98059 (MEK inhibitor), and the siRNA against STAT3. Western blot and RT-PCR indicated that LIF induced the expression of NK-1R, which was inhibited by the inhibitors mentioned above. No significant interaction was found between JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway. In summary, bronchial epithelial cell changes in asthma are induced by LIF which promotes the expression of NK-1R, and JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway may participate in this process.
Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a pleiotrophic glycoprotein
that belongs to the interleukin-6 (IL-6) cytokine family, which
shares gp130 as the signal transducer. In the downstream of gp130,
two important signal-transducing pathways have been recognized,
the janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription
(JAK/STAT) pathway and the ras mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK) pathway [1-6]. There is widespread distribution of LIF within human lung tissue, where its physiological level is very low, but when exposed to
proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, LIF gene expression
upregulated [7]. In addition, high levels of LIF were also found in atopicpatients and patients with diffuse pulmonary
inflammation [8, 9].Similar to the other neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth
factor (NGF), it has been reported that LIF has been implicated in
various processes of neuronal development, differentiation,
survival and neurogenesis [10-12]. Furthermore, it was indicated that LIF could increase the expression of substance P
and its receptor (neurokinin-1 receptor; NK-1R) both in mRNA and
protein levels [13, 14]. Substance P and its receptor are
main effective substances in airway neurogenic inflammation, Hu
et al demonstrated that NGF upregulates NK-1R expression in normal
rat lungs, and the expression of NK-1R increased in rat lungs
which were infected with respiratory syncytial virus
[15-17]. These data suggested that LIF has neuromodulatory
role in the airways and may be an important signal molecule in the
airway response to inflammation [18].Bronchial epithelial cell is a barrier to airway structure, and it
is an important target cell type in most respiratory diseases such
as asthma. High levels of LIF and NK-1R were observed in bronchial
epithelial cells of asthmatic rats [19]. However, whether the increased expression of NK-1R is related to LIF is unknown. If so,
whether the role of LIF is mediated through JAK/STAT pathway and
(or) MAPK pathway needs further investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal preparation of asthmatic models
Healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats, 6 to 8 weeks of age, were
provided by the experimental animal center of Central South
University. The animals were divided into 2 groups at random
(asthmatic group and control group, n = 10), and they were housed
under specific pathogen-free conditions. Sensitization (the
asthmatic group) was produced with an intraperitoneal injection of
100 mg of chicken OVA(Sigma), 200 mg of aluminum
hydroxide(Sigma), and 5 × 109 heat-killed
Bordetella pertussis (Wuhan Institute of Biological
Products) in 1 ml of sterile saline. The sham sensitization
group (the control group) was treated by sterile saline
intraperitoneal injection. Two weeks later, the rats in the
asthmatic group were placed in a Plexiglas chamber (20 L) and
challenged every day with 1% OVA for 30 min using an
ultrasonic nebulizer, while those in the control group received
filtered air only. After a challenge peroid (10 days), the rats
were killed by decapitation and bloodletting, and nonperfused
excised lung tissues were fixed in 4% polyoxymethylene, then
embedded in paraffin, and finally sliced into sections
(5 μm thick) for further study. The study protocol was in
accordance with the guidelines for animal research and was
approved by the Ethical and Research Committee of the hospital.
Cell culture
Normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells were obtained from
the cell culture collection center of Yuantai Biosource (it was
conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and the
guidelines of the Ethical and Research Committee of the hospital).
NHBE cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and cells were
maintained at 37° in a humidified atmosphere containing
5% CO. After 24 h in serum-free medium, cells were stimulated with recombinant humanLIF(Chemicon) (5 ng/ml,
30 min for detecting STAT3 and ERK1/2; 5 ng/ml, 24 h
for detecting NK-1R) in pre-exposure or absence of AG-490 (JAK2
inhibitor, Biosource) (50 nmol/mL, 1 h), PD-98059 (MEK
inhibitor, Cell signaling technology) (20 nmol/mL, 1 h),
PMA(ALEXIS Biochemicals) (10 ng/mL, 4 h), and the small
interfering RNA(siRNA) against STAT3(Genesil
Biotechnology) (2 μg/mL, 24 h).
Immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry
Immunoreactivity for phospho-STAT3(p-STAT3),
phospho-ERK1/2(p-ERK1/2), NK-1R and LIF proteins were detected by
streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex method(SABC) (Boster
Biotechnology). The primary antibodies against rat p-STAT3(rabbit
polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p-ERK1/2(mouse
polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), NK-1R(rabbit
polyclonal antibody, Novus Biologicals), and LIF(rabbit polyclonal
antibody, Boster Biotechnology) were applied respectively. The
secondary antibodies were affinity-purified biotinylated goat
anti-rabbit(mouse) IgG (Boster Biotechnology). Nuclei were
counterstained lightly with hematoxylin.NHBE cells were plated at an approximate density of 2×105 cells/cm2 onto tissue culture chamber slides (Lab
Tek, Tokyo) in medium containing 10% FBS. After 24 h, cells
were replenished with serum-free medium and incubated for
24 h. NHBE cells were preincubated with or without AG-490,
PD-98059, PMA, or the siRNA against STAT3 and then stimulated with
LIF. Following this, the cells were fixed in 4% polyoxymethylene,
and stained with primary antibody against NK-1R. Primary antibody
was detected by affinity-purified biotinylated secondary antibody
(Boster Biotechnology), and the stained cells were observed by
microscopy. Ten fields (×200) were chosen at random under
microscope, and a positive cell ratio was obtained by counting
(positive cells number/total cells number).
RNA interference
The siRNA oligonucleotide sequences against STAT3 (NM_139276.2)
were in accordance with Lee et al and Konnikova
et al [20, 21], siRNA-1: 5′-GATCCGCATCTGCCTAGATCGGCTATTCAAGACGTAGCCGATCTAGGCAGATGTTTTTTGAATTCA-3′,
3′-GCGTAGACGGATCTAGCCGATAAGTTCTGCATCGGCTAGATCCGTCTACAAAAAACTTAAGTTCGA-5′;
siRNA-2:
5′-GATCCGTGTTCTCTATCAGCACAATTTCAAGACGATTGTGCTGATAGAGAACATTTTTTGAATTCA-3′,
3′-GCACAAGAGATAGTCGTGTTAAAGTTCTGCTAACACGACTATCTCTTGTAAAAAACTTAAGTTCGA-5;
negative control siRNA:
5′-GATCCGACTTCATAAGGCGCATGCTTCAAGACGGCATGCGCCTTATGAAGTCTTTTTTGTCGACA-3′,
3′-GCTGAAGTATTCCGCGTACGAAGTTCTGCCGTACGCGGAATACTTCAGAAAAAACAGCTGTTCGA-5′
(synthesized by Genesil Biotechnology). The siRNAs
(2 μg/mL) were introduced into cells using the METAFECTENE
highly efficient transfection reagent (Biontex) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
Western blot
Cells were harvested in lysis buffer, and the lysates were cleared
by centrifugation at 12000 g for 10 min at 4°. The
proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, then probed with primary
antibodies against humanSTAT3, p-STAT3(tyr) (rabbit polyclonal
antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2 (mouse
polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), GAPDH (rabbit
polyclonal antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The primary
antibodies that bounded to the target proteins were detected using
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG(Promega), or
anti-mouse IgG(Cortex Biochem), as appropriate. The antibodies
were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescent detection (Pierce
Biotechnology). The intensity of target bands was corrected by
GAPDH calculated with the FluorChem 8900 software system.
RT-PCR
Total RNAs were extracted using TRIZOL(Invitrogen). cDNAs were
synthesized using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA
Synthesis Kit (Fermentas) with oligo(dT)18 primers. The primer
sequences used were as follows. HumanNK-1R: forward primer 5′
GGGACTCCTCTGACCGCTAC 3′, reverse primer 5′
TCCAGGCGGCTGACTTTGTA 3′, PCR product 376 bp (753–1128);
human β-actin: forward primer 5′ CCTTCCTGGGCATGGAGTC 3′,
reverse primer 5′ GAGGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTTC 3′, PCR
product 204 bp (867–1070). RT-PCR analysis was
performed as described by Hu et al with minor modifications
[15]. The intensity of target mRNA levels was corrected by β-actin transcripts calculated with the FluorChem 8900
software system.
Statistical analysis
The data presented in (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) were expressed as means ±SD (n = 3). Statistical significance among mean values
was evaluated with an ANOVA. Differences were considered
significant when P < .05.
Figure 1
Expression of NK-1R, LIF, p-STAT3, and p-ERK1/2
in lung tissues of asthmatic rats (SABC × 200).
Immunohistochemistry was performed on lung tissue of asthmatic
rats. There were higher expressions for NK-1R ((a)
control group, (b) asthmatic group) and LIF ((c) control group,
(d) asthmatic group) in the asthmatic rats than those in the
control rats, and the similar changes were observed for p-STAT3
((e) control group, (f) asthmatic group) and p-ERK1/2 ((g) control
group, (h) asthmatic group). The main positive cell type was
airway epithelial cell.
Figure 2
Effects of AG-490, PD-98059, or PMA on
LIF-induced activation of signal transduction and activation of
transcription_(STAT3) and ERK1/2. Western blot was performed on
NHBE cells that had been preincubated with or without AG-490,
PD-98059, or PMA and then stimulated with LIF. (a) LIF induced
activation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3, and tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 was inhibited by AG-490, but not by
PD-98059, and not affected by PMA. (b) LIF did not enhance the
expression of total-STAT3, and its expression was not affected by
AG-490, PD-98059, and PMA. (c) LIF induced activation of
phosphorylation of ERK1/2, and ERK1/2 activation was inhibited by
PD-98059, but not by AG-490; PMA increased the expression of
p-ERK1/2 in NHBE cells, but there were no significant differences
between the cells stimulated with LIF and the cells stimulated
with LIF in the presence of PMA. (d) and (e) LIF did not enhance
the expression of total-ERK1/2, furthermore, AG-490, PD-98059, and
PMA also did not affect it. Experiments were repeated three times
with similar results, and the data was expressed as the mean ratio
(target/GAPDH) ± SD.
Figure 3
Effects of AG-490, PD-98059, PMA, or
siRNA-1(STAT3) on LIF-induced expression of NK-1R detected by
immunocytochemistry_(SABC × 200).
Immunocytochemistry was performed on cells that had been
preincubated with or without AG-490, PD-98059, PMA, or
siRNA-1(STAT3) and then stimulated with LIF ((a) control, (b)
PD-98059, (c) AG-490, (d) LIF, (e) PMA, (f) LIF + PD-95059, (g)
LIF + PMA, (h) LIF + AG-490, (i) LIF + control siRNA, (j) LIF +
sham plasmid, (k) LIF + siRNA-1 against STAT3). LIF induced
expression of NK-1R, which was inhibited by AG-490, PD-98059, and
siRNA-1 against STAT3, but was affected neither by the
control siRNA nor the sham plasmid. Experiments were repeated
three times with similar results, and the data was expressed as
the mean ratio (positive cells number/total cells number) ±
SD.
Figure 4
Effects of AG-490, PD-98059, PMA, or
siRNA-1(STAT3) on LIF-induced expression of NK-1R detected by
RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed on cells that had been preincubated
with or without AG-490, PD-98059, PMA, or siRNA-1(STAT3) and then
stimulated with LIF. (a) LIF induced expression of NK-1R mRNA, and
that was inhibited by AG-490 and PD-98059; PMA increased the
expression of NK-1R mRNA in NHBE cells. (b) LIF-induced expression
of NK-1R mRNA was inhibited by siRNA-1 against STAT3, but was
affected neither by the control siRNA nor the sham plasmid.
Experiments were repeated three times with similar results, and
the data was expressed as the mean ratio_(target/β-actin)
± SD.
Figure 5
Effects of siRNA(STAT3) on LIF-induced activation
of signal transduction and activation of transcription (STAT3) and
ERK1/2. Western blot was performed on NHBE cells that had been
preincubated with or without siRNA(STAT3) and then stimulated with
LIF. (a) LIF induced activation of tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT3, and tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 was inhibited by
siRNA-1 and siRNA-2, but neither by control siRNA nor sham
plasmid. (b) Similiar to phosphorylation of STAT3, total-STAT3 was
inhibited by siRNA-1 and siRNA-2, but neither by control siRNA nor
sham plasmid. (c) LIF induced activation of phosphorylation of
ERK1/2, but ERK1/2 activation was not inhibited by siRNA-1 against
STAT3. (d) Similiar to phosphorylation of ERK1/2, the expression
of total-ERK1/2 was not affected by siRNA-1 against STAT3.
Experiments were repeated three times with similar results, and
the data was expressed as the mean ratio(target/GAPDH) ±
SD.
RESULTS
Expression of LIF, NK-1R, p-STAT3, and p-ERK1/2
in lung tissues of asthmatic rats
Immunohistochemistry was performed in lung tissues of rats, and it
indicated a higher expression of LIF in the asthmatic rats
compared to that in the control group. Consistent with that,
similar changes were observed for NK-1R, p-STAT3, and p-ERK1/2.
The main positive cell type was airway epithelial cell, and other
positive types were also observed such as lymphocyte
(Figure 1).
Effects of AG-490, PD-98059, or PMA on LIF-induced
activation of signal transduction and activation of
transcription (STAT3) and ERK1/2
Western blot was performed on cells that had been preincubated
with or without AG-490, PD-98059, or PMA and then stimulated with
LIF. LIF induced activation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3
(versus the control cells, P < .01), and tyrosine phosphorylation
of STAT3 was inhibited by AG-490 (the cells stimulated with LIF in
the presence of AG-490 versus the cells stimulated with LIF,
P < .01), but not by PD-98059 (the cells stimulated with LIF in
the presence of PD-98059 versus the cells stimulated with LIF,
P > .05), and the results also indicated phosphorylation of STAT3
that was not affected by PMA (Figure 2(a)).
Nevertheless, the expression of total-STAT3 was not affected by
the factors mentioned above (Figure 2(b)). LIF induced
activation of phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (versus the control cells,
P < .01), and ERK1/2 activation was inhibited by PD-98059 (the
cells stimulated with LIF in the presence of PD-98059 versus the
cells stimulated with LIF, P < .01), but not by AG-490 (the cells
stimulated with LIF in the presence of AG-490 versus the cells
stimulated with LIF, P > .05) (Figure 2(c)). Similar to
that of total-STAT3, the expression of total-ERK1/2 did not change
(Figures 2(d), 2(e)). PMA increased the expression
of p-ERK1/2 in NHBE cells (versus the control cells, P < .01), but
there was no significant difference between the cells stimulated
with LIF and the cells stimulated with LIF in the presence of PMA.
Effects of AG-490, PD-98059, or PMA on LIF-induced
expression of NK-1R
Immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR were performed on cells that had
been preincubated with or without AG-490, PD-98059, or PMA and
then stimulated with LIF. LIF induced expression of NK-1R in NHBE
cells (versus the control cells, P < .01), both AG-490 and
PD-98059 suppressed the LIF-induced expression of NK-1R by 58%
(the cells stimulated with LIF in the presence of AG-490 versus
the cells stimulated with LIF, P < .01) and 60% (the cells
stimulated with LIF in the presence of PD-98059 versus the cells
stimulated with LIF, P < .01); on the contrary, PMA increased the
expression of NK-1R in NHBE cells (Figures 3 and
4(a)).
Effects of siRNA(STAT3) on LIF-induced activation of
signal transduction and activation of transcription (STAT3)
and ERK1/2
Western blot was performed on cells that had been preincubated
with or without siRNA(STAT3) and then stimulated with LIF.
LIF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 was inhibited by
siRNA-1 and siRNA-2, and the inhibition ratio was 85% and 42%,
respectively (Figure 5(a)). In addition, the expression
of total-STAT3 was also inhibited by siRNA-1 and siRNA-2 (56% and
37%, resp) (Figure 5(b)). Because of the higher
inhibition ratio, siRNA-1 was later chosen for interference in the
cells. However, siRNA-1 did not affect the expression of p-ERK1/2
and total-ERK1/2 (Figures 5(c), 5(d)).
Effects of siRNA(STAT3) on LIF-induced expression
of NK-1R
Immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR were performed on cells that had
been preincubated with or without siRNA-1 (STAT3) and then
stimulated with LIF. The LIF-induced expression of NK-1R was
inhibited by siRNA-1 both at the mRNA level and the protein level
(the cells stimulated with LIF in the presence of siRNA-1 versus the
cells stimulated with LIF, P < .01), but it was not affected by
negative control siRNA and sham plasmid (the cells stimulated with
LIF in the presence of control siRNA or sham plasmid versus the cells
stimulated with LIF, P > .05) (Figures 3 and 4(b)).
DISCUSSION
LIF is a cytokine at the interface between neurobiology and
immunology [22]. Exposure of neural tissue to proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β or injury, increases the
synthesis and release of LIF, which in turn increases mRNA
and protein of substance P and its receptor (NK-1R). Similarly,
LIF also can induce neuropeptide synthesis and release in neurons
that do not normally produce neuropeptides, and these studies
suggested that LIF has an important neuro-immune linkage function
[13, 14, 23]. LIF dose dependently augmented eosinophil
migration and other functions in response to substance P,
resulting in bidirectional interactions between inflammatory cells
and nerves in allergic diseases [8].It was found that serum LIF levels were higher in atopicpatients
with mild asthma than in nonatopic normal donors [8]. Consistent with that, high levels of LIF were also found in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained from patients with the acute
respiratory distress syndrome, in which there was diffuse
pulmonary inflammation [9]. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated
the presence of LIF in epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells, and
nerve fibers in the human airway, and it was found that these
airway structural cell types release LIF and its receptor (LIFR)
in response to inflammatory stimuli such as proinflammatory
cytokines. Subsequently, LIF augmented contractile responses to
tachykinins in airway explants [7, 24].In animal models, it was indicated that NK-1R was involved in the
development of allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity to
histamine after both the early asthmatic reactions and late
asthmatic reactions, and NK-1R-mediated inflammation of airways
may contribute to this process [25]. In the present study, the airway tissues of asthmatic rats were tested by
immunohistochemistry, and it was found that LIF expression in the
asthmatic rats was higher than that in the normal control group,
at the same time, NK-1R expression in the asthmatic rats also
increased.Incubation of rat sympathetic cervical ganglia with LIF
downregulated the expression of muscarinic M2R mRNA, while at
the same time increased the expression of substance P and NK-1R
[13, 14]. After incubation of tracheal explants with LIF,
there were no observable increases of substance P expression
compared to the control, however, measurement of NK-1R expression
was not done [18]. Substance P is a member of tachykinin family, which is usually not steadily expressed, and is not easily
detected. As a ligand, substance P can express biological effect
on the condition of combining with its specific receptor NK-1R,
and thus, the biological activity of substance P would be
reflected by detecting the expression of NK-1R.LIF is a pleiotrophic glycoprotein that belongs to the IL-6
cytokine family, which shares the common gp130 receptor chain as
the signal transducing protein. LIF signaling is mediated through
the LIF receptor which heterodimerizes with the gp130 receptor
upon LIF binding [5]. Activation of the LIFR-β-gp130 heterodimer results in the rapid activation of janus kinases
(JAKs) which in turn phosphorylate tyrosine residues of
LIFR-β and gp130 [3, 4, 6]. These phosphorylated tyrosine residues form docking sites for signaling molecules including
STAT3 and SHP2 [4]. STATs are transcription factors, which form dimers upon phosphorylation of a specific tyrosine residue
that is located in a conserved SHP2 domain [26]. STAT dimerization allows nuclear translocation and the transcriptional
activation of target genes [26]. SHP2 is a tyrosine
phosphatase which signals upstream of the Ras/MAP kinase signal
transduction pathway [4, 27–29]. As a result, downstream of the pathway molecules such as ERK1/2 and p38 is activated
sequentially.As the important pathways in eukaryocyte, Ras/MEK/ERK
cascade pathway and JAK/STAT cascade pathway may be closely
interrelated. In many cell types in culture, sustained
expression of activated Ras or its downstream effector
can elicit cell cycle arrest and differentiation, and some
reseachers revealed that the biological effects of the
Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway were activated via LIF/JAK/STAT
pathway [30-32]. However, in LIF/gp130-mediated cardiac
hypertrophy, AG490 (JAK2 inhibitor) and PD98059 (a specific MEK
inhibitor) were applied to compare the significance between ERK
cascade and JAK/STAT cascade, and it was shown that LIF-induced
expression of c-fos and others was markedly suppressed by PD98059
and moderately suppressed by AG490, but STAT3 activation was not
suppressed by PD98059 and ERK1/2 activation was not suppressed by
AG490 [33]. It was suggested that the two pathways are independent of each other.In the present study, the airway tissues of asthmatic rats were
tested for LIF-linked substance by immunohistochemistry. Compared
with the control, there were increased expressions for LIF and
NK-1R in the asthmatic rats, and similar changes were observed for
p-STAT3 and p-ERK1/2. The main positive cell type was airway
epithelial cell, and other types were also observed such as
lymphocyte and structural cells. These results were similar to the
data provided by Knight et al [24] and Bai et al [34].
Combining these findings with the data mentioned above, it is
hypothesized that LIF enhances the NK-1R expression in airway of
asthmatic models, and the enhancement may be connected with the
JAK-STAT pathway or the MAPK pathway. Furthermore, airway
epithelial cells may be the main effective cell type in this
process.To test the hypothesis, we cultured NHBE cells
treated with LIF, inhibitors of the JAK/STAT and MAPK/ERK pathways
(AG490 and PD98059), and the activator of protein kinase C(PMA).
This study demonstrated that LIF induced expression of NK-1R in
NHBE cells, which was determined by RT-PCR and
immunocytochemistry. In this process, similar to NK-1R, the
expressions of p-STAT3 and p-ERK1/2 in NHBE cells treated with LIF
all increased. Expressions of total-STAT3 and total-ERK1/2 between
LIF-treated cells and the control cells were not significantly
different. AG490 and PD98059 suppressed the LIF-induced expression
of NK-1R. AG490 inhibited the LIF-induced phosphorylation of
STAT3, whereas PD98059 showed no inhibition; on the contrary,
PD98059 clearly inhibited the LIF-induced phosphorylation of
ERK1/2, whereas AG490 showed no inhibition. PMA, a potent
activator of protein kinase C, is considered to have a strong
effect to activate ERK1/2, and further increase the levels of
related substances in the downsteam of ERK pathway (eg, c-fos and
c-jun) [35]. Our study showed that, compared with the control, PMA increased the expressions of p-ERK1/2 and NK-1R in
NHBE cells; but there was no significant difference between the
cells stimulated with LIF in the presence of PMA and the cells
stimulated with LIF. These findings indicated that the JAK/STAT
pathway and the MAPK pathway play different roles in LIF-induced
expression of NK-1R in NHBE cells, and suggest that these pathways
may be independent in producing a marked biological effect.To further confirm the results mentioned above, we designed this
study to block STAT3 expression by siRNA. It was found that the
siRNA against STAT3 specifically reduced STAT3 expression in
LIF-induced NHBE cells. For the blockade of STAT3, the LIF-induced
expression of NK-1R also decreased, whereas the expression of
ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2 and total-ERK1/2) did not change in this process.In conclusion, we have demonstrated that NK-1R expression is
upregulated in NHBE cells when exposed to LIF, and this process
may be mediated by JAK2/STAT3 pathway and ERK1/2 pathway, but no
observable interaction was found between the two pathways in the
present study. Since signaling cascades often converge from
multiple upstream mediators, it is possible that the cross-talk
and alternative pathways exist. Thus, whether these factors
influenced our results further investigation is required.
Authors: D P Gearing; M R Comeau; D J Friend; S D Gimpel; C J Thut; J McGourty; K K Brasher; J A King; S Gillis; B Mosley Journal: Science Date: 1992-03-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: H Kodama; K Fukuda; J Pan; M Sano; T Takahashi; T Kato; S Makino; T Manabe; M Murata; S Ogawa Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jan Jacob Schuringa; Saskia van der Schaaf; Edo Vellenga; Bart J L Eggen; Wiebe Kruijer Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2002-03-10 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: Soo Ok Lee; Wei Lou; Khusroo M Qureshi; Farideh Mehraein-Ghomi; Donald L Trump; Allen C Gao Journal: Prostate Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Chengping Hu; Katrin Wedde-Beer; Alexander Auais; Maria M Rodriguez; Giovanni Piedimonte Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Bopaiah P Cheppudira; Beatrice M Girard; Susan E Malley; Abbey Dattilio; Kristin C Schutz; Victor May; Margaret A Vizzard Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2009-07-22