Literature DB >> 1739177

Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration.

G V Stiegmann1, J S Goff, A Mansour, N Pearlman, R M Reveille, L Norton.   

Abstract

Thirty-four patients with suspected common bile duct stones were randomized to undergo endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to open cholecystectomy or to have open cholecystectomy, operative cholangiography, and common bile duct exploration. Sixteen underwent the first protocol, and 18 the second. Analysis of the ability to clear stones from the common bile duct, morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, length of operation, and hospital cost showed no difference in outcome between patients treated by either method. These data suggest there is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage to treating patients with suspected duct stones by precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739177     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  29 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  C K Tai; C N Tang; J P Y Ha; C H Chau; W T Siu; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Authors:  A de Vries; S C Donkervoort; A A W van Geloven; E G J M Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Sequential intraluminal endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment for bile duct stones associated with gallstones.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Costantini; M Rossi; M Anselmino; S Pianalto; D Oselladore; D Pizzato; L Norberto; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Open common bile duct exploration--end of an epoch?

Authors:  S T O'Sullivan; D J Hehir; G C O'Sullivan; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  C F Gholson; C Dungan; G Neff; R Ferguson; D Favrot; I Nandy; P Banish; K Sittig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Jussi Luhtala; Johanna Mrena; Hannu Kautiainen; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparoscopic trans-cystic-duct common-bile-duct exploration.

Authors:  E H Phillips; R J Rosenthal; B J Carroll; M J Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors:  G Berci; L Morgenstern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  'Single-Sitting' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stone for Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Md Ibrarullah; Tapas Mishra; Ambika P Dash; Devanand Mohapatra; M S Modi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.