Literature DB >> 17387521

Importance of preserving the C7 spinous process and attached nuchal ligament in French-door laminoplasty to reduce postoperative axial symptoms.

Tatsuto Takeuchi1, Yasuhiro Shono.   

Abstract

A comparative clinical trial was conducted to clarify the importance of preserving the C7 spinous process and attached nuchal ligament for the reduction of the axial symptoms after French-door laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Forty-one cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients were enrolled. French-door laminoplasty from C3 to C7 in 22 patients (group 1), and from C3 to C6 in 19 patients (group 2) was performed. The whole structure of the C7 spinous process and the attached nuchal ligament were preserved in group 2. The pre- and post-operative evaluation regarding severity of clinical symptoms was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Pre-operative and subjective outcome regarding axial symptoms were also assessed using a visual analog pain scale questionnaire (VAS: 10-0, where a higher score indicates greater pain) at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Non-parametric testing (Mann-Whitney's U test) was used to establish differences between the two groups for categorical data (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in pre- and post-operative JOA score. The mean VAS was 5.6 +/- 1.4 in group 1, 5.4 +/- 1.7 in group 2 pre-operatively, and 6.4 +/- 1.7 in group 1 and 2.4 +/- 1.9 in group 2 at 1-year follow-up. The mean VAS score at 2-year follow-up exhibited 6.2 +/- 1.9 in Group 1, 2.3 +/- 1.8 in group 2. There was no significant difference in VAS between the two groups before surgery (P = 0.506), but significant differences were noticed at 1-year and 2-year follow-up (P < 0.05), indicating the presence of significantly fewer post-operative axial symptoms in group 2. Laminoplasty of the entire C7 structure is not necessary to obtain satisfactory recovery based on JOA score. Preservation of the C7 spinous process and the attached nuchal ligamentous structures is important to reduce post-laminoplasty axial symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17387521      PMCID: PMC2200737          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0352-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  The fine connective tissue architecture of the human ligamentum nuchae.

Authors:  G M Johnson; M Zhang; D G Jones
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  J Mochida; T Nomura; M Chiba; K Nishimura; E Toh
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-10

3.  CG-clip expansive open-door laminoplasty: a technical note.

Authors:  G R Gillett; A M Erasmus; C R Lind
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note.

Authors:  Tateru Shiraishi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Bilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty with hydroxyapatite spacers and titanium screws.

Authors:  Masakazu Takayasu; Teruhide Takagi; Toshihisa Nishizawa; Koji Osuka; Takehiko Nakajima; Jun Yoshida
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Y Kawaguchi; H Matsui; H Ishihara; R Gejo; O Yoshino
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-10

7.  Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years.

Authors:  E Wada; S Suzuki; A Kanazawa; T Matsuoka; S Miyamoto; K Yonenobu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  C C Edwards; J G Heller; D H Silcox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure.

Authors:  Peter White; George Lewith; Phil Prescott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of cervical double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacer.

Authors:  Shinichiro Kubo; Vijay K Goel; Seok-Jo Yang; Naoya Tajima
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Medium-term outcomes of C3-6 laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Motoki Iwasaki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Sheng-Dan Jiang; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of the outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, undergone canal expansive laminoplasty supported with instrumentation in a group of Indian population - a prospective study.

Authors:  Subhadip Mandal; U Banerjee; A S Mukherjee; Subhajyoti Mandal; Srikanta Kundu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-29

Review 4.  Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Operative outcomes for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  J G Galbraith; J S Butler; A M Dolan; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-10-20

6.  Preserving the C7 spinous process in laminectomy combined with lateral mass screw to prevent axial symptom.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Yong Shen; Ying-Ze Zhang; Wen-Yuan Ding; Jia-Xin Xu; Jun-Ming Cao
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Laminoplasty techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Lance K Mitsunaga; Eric O Klineberg; Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-03-06

8.  Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Wei Du; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Neck Pain Following Cervical Laminoplasty: Does Preservation of the C2 Muscle Attachments and/or C7 Matter?

Authors:  K Daniel Riew; Annie L Raich; Joseph R Dettori; John G Heller
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-04

10.  C3-6 laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy maintains satisfactory long-term surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Motoki Iwasaki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.