Literature DB >> 15534418

The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure.

Peter White1, George Lewith, Phil Prescott.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial were asked to complete various questionnaires, which were then compared to establish validity for a new neck pain questionnaire.
OBJECTIVES: To validate a new and brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neck pain is a very common problem and one that clinicians will be required to treat with some regularity. In today's climate of evidence-based practice and the need to quantify and justify clinical intervention, a quick and easy method to evaluate progress is required. Such a measure has already been produced for those experiencing back pain, but as yet, there is no such measure for neck pain and this needs to be addressed.
METHODS: The back pain measure was adapted to enable its use with patients with neck pain. Repeatability was assessed by using a 1-week test/retest on 104 patients who were enrolled in a neck pain trial. Validity was assessed by comparing the new questionnaire against other already well validated measures (i.e., the Neck Disability Index and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain) with 133 patients.
RESULTS: The test/retest showed excellent repeatability with high intraclass correlations and P < 0.001 for each question tested. The Core Neck Pain Questionnaire also showed good validity, giving close agreement to the other comparison measures.
CONCLUSION: The short Core Neck Pain Questionnaire has been demonstrated to be repeatable and valid as a brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534418     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137066.50291.da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Should smoking habit dictate the fusion technique?

Authors:  A Luca; A F Mannion; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain.

Authors:  Grzegorz Miekisiak; Marta Kollataj; Jan Dobrogowski; Wojciech Kloc; Witold Libionka; Mariusz Banach; Dariusz Latka; Tomasz Sobolewski; Adam Sulewski; Andrzej Nowakowski; Grzegorz Kiwic; Adam Pala; Tomasz Potaczek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Assessment of patients with neck pain: a review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools.

Authors:  Victoria Misailidou; Paraskevi Malliou; Anastasia Beneka; Alexandros Karagiannidis; Georgios Godolias
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-06

5.  An observational study of patient-rated outcome after atlantoaxial fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Andrea Luca; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.

Authors:  C D Fankhauser; U Mutter; E Aghayev; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews.

Authors:  Birgitta Wiitavaara; Martin Björklund; Christine Brulin; Mats Djupsjöbacka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.