Literature DB >> 21264674

Medium-term outcomes of C3-6 laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a prospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Hironobu Sakaura1, Noboru Hosono, Yoshihiro Mukai, Motoki Iwasaki, Hideki Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

C3-6 laminoplasty preserving muscle insertions into the C7 spinous process is reportedly associated with a significantly decreased frequency of postoperative axial neck pain. However, no prospective study has reported medium-term outcomes of C3-6 laminoplasty. The purpose of this study was to elucidate medium-term outcomes after C3-6 laminoplasty. Subjects comprised 31 patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent C3-6 laminoplasty preserving all bilateral muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes and were followed for ≥5 years. Clinical and radiological data were prospectively collected. Neurological status was assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Axial neck pain was graded as severe, moderate or mild. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) were assessed by comparing serial lateral radiographs. Mean JOA score improved significantly from 10.6 before surgery to 14.7 at the time of maximum recovery, and slightly declined to 14.3 at final follow-up. In six patients who developed late deterioration, these conditions were unrelated to the cervical spine. As of final follow-up, only one patient (3.2%) had complained of axial neck pain persisting for 5 years. Although progression of OPLL was found in 63.6% of patients, none had experienced neurological deterioration due to this progression. At final follow-up, sagittal alignment of the cervical spine was more lordotic than before surgery. Medium-term outcomes of C3-6 laminoplasty were satisfactory. Frequencies of persistent axial neck pain and loss of cervical lordosis after surgery remained significantly decreased for ≥5 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264674      PMCID: PMC3099160          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1690-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  Pathomechanism, pathogenesis, and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis.

Authors:  K Fukui; O Kataoka; T Sho; M Sumi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain.

Authors:  N Hosono; H Sakaura; Y Mukai; R Fujii; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament thicken following cervical laminoplasty?

Authors:  Takeshi Hori; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yuto Ogawa; Ken Ishii; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Morio Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Preservation of C7 spinous process does not influence the long-term outcome after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Higashino; S Katoh; K Sairyo; T Sakai; H Kosaka; N Yasui
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine.

Authors:  J P Nolan; H H Sherk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Can laminoplasty maintain the cervical alignment even when the C2 lamina is contained?

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Atsushi Seichi; Toru Akune; Naohiro Kawamura; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  Noboru Hosono; Hironobu Sakaura; Yoshihiro Mukai; Takahiro Ishii; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-07

9.  Cervical spinal deformity following craniotomy and upper cervical laminectomy for posterior fossa tumors in children.

Authors:  P Steinbok; M Boyd; D Cochrane
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  Cervical spine: degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Andrew G Todd
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

2.  Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Xiao Ji Luo; Qian Xing Deng; Jia Hong Li; Nan Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rongqing Qin; Xiaoqing Chen; Pin Zhou; Ming Li; Jie Hao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Shengrong Lin; Feifei Zhou; Yu Sun; Zhongqiang Chen; Fengshan Zhang; Shengfa Pan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Neck Pain following Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Addisu Mesfin; Moon-Soo Park; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Tapanut Chuntarapas; Kwang Sup Song; Han Jo Kim; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-10-25

6.  Preoperative Factors Affecting Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Single-Door Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yanbin Liu; Le Liu; Zhi Zhang; Bin Sheng; Xuegang Lun; Zhong Cao; Jianmin Sun; Guangming Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-10-16

7.  C3-6 laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy maintains satisfactory long-term surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Motoki Iwasaki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-06-18

8.  The Midterm Surgical Outcome of Modified Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ru-Ping Lee; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Dong Li; Jinjun Li; Hai Meng; Yong Yang; Ai Guo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with K-line (-) in the neck neutral position but K-line (+) in the neck extension position: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Yan Zhang; Ning Zhang; Zheng-Kuan Xv; Hao Li; Gang Chen; Fang-Cai Li; Qi-Xin Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.