Literature DB >> 17387144

Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates.

Hiroshi Kikuta1, Mary Laplante, Pavla Navratilova, Anna Z Komisarczuk, Pär G Engström, David Fredman, Altuna Akalin, Mario Caccamo, Ian Sealy, Kerstin Howe, Julien Ghislain, Guillaume Pezeron, Philippe Mourrain, Staale Ellingsen, Andrew C Oates, Christine Thisse, Bernard Thisse, Isabelle Foucher, Birgit Adolf, Andrea Geling, Boris Lenhard, Thomas S Becker.   

Abstract

We report evidence for a mechanism for the maintenance of long-range conserved synteny across vertebrate genomes. We found the largest mammal-teleost conserved chromosomal segments to be spanned by highly conserved noncoding elements (HCNEs), their developmental regulatory target genes, and phylogenetically and functionally unrelated "bystander" genes. Bystander genes are not specifically under the control of the regulatory elements that drive the target genes and are expressed in patterns that are different from those of the target genes. Reporter insertions distal to zebrafish developmental regulatory genes pax6.1/2, rx3, id1, and fgf8 and miRNA genes mirn9-1 and mirn9-5 recapitulate the expression patterns of these genes even if located inside or beyond bystander genes, suggesting that the regulatory domain of a developmental regulatory gene can extend into and beyond adjacent transcriptional units. We termed these chromosomal segments genomic regulatory blocks (GRBs). After whole genome duplication in teleosts, GRBs, including HCNEs and target genes, were often maintained in both copies, while bystander genes were typically lost from one GRB, strongly suggesting that evolutionary pressure acts to keep the single-copy GRBs of higher vertebrates intact. We show that loss of bystander genes and other mutational events suffered by duplicated GRBs in teleost genomes permits target gene identification and HCNE/target gene assignment. These findings explain the absence of evolutionary breakpoints from large vertebrate chromosomal segments and will aid in the recognition of position effect mutations within human GRBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17387144      PMCID: PMC1855176          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6086307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  68 in total

Review 1.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mapping cis-regulatory domains in the human genome using multi-species conservation of synteny.

Authors:  Nadav Ahituv; Shyam Prabhakar; Francis Poulin; Edward M Rubin; Olivier Couronne
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  MicroRNA expression in zebrafish embryonic development.

Authors:  Erno Wienholds; Wigard P Kloosterman; Eric Miska; Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra; Eugene Berezikov; Ewart de Bruijn; H Robert Horvitz; Sakari Kauppinen; Ronald H A Plasterk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A nonsense mutation of the MASS1 gene in a family with febrile and afebrile seizures.

Authors:  Junko Nakayama; Ying-Hui Fu; Anna M Clark; Satoko Nakahara; Kenzo Hamano; Nobuaki Iwasaki; Akira Matsui; Tadao Arinami; Louis J Ptácek
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development.

Authors:  M Lewandoski; X Sun; G R Martin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes.

Authors:  Ian G Woods; Catherine Wilson; Brian Friedlander; Patricia Chang; Daengnoy K Reyes; Rebecca Nix; Peter D Kelly; Felicia Chu; John H Postlethwait; William S Talbot
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genome-wide homozygosity mapping localizes a gene for autosomal recessive non-progressive infantile ataxia to 20q11-q13.

Authors:  Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Tanya M Teslovich; MaryPat Jones; M Michael Barmada; Toril Fagerheim; Arve Dahl; Diana M Escolar; Jeffrey M Trent; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Dietrich A Stephan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Aniridia-associated translocations, DNase hypersensitivity, sequence comparison and transgenic analysis redefine the functional domain of PAX6.

Authors:  D A Kleinjan; A Seawright; A Schedl; R A Quinlan; S Danes; V van Heyningen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Progressive impairment of developing neuroendocrine cell lineages in the hypothalamus of mice lacking the Orthopedia gene.

Authors:  D Acampora; M P Postiglione; V Avantaggiato; M Di Bonito; F M Vaccarino; J Michaud; A Simeone
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 10.  Long-range control of gene expression: emerging mechanisms and disruption in disease.

Authors:  Dirk A Kleinjan; Veronica van Heyningen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  159 in total

1.  An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement.

Authors:  Ignacio Maeso; Manuel Irimia; Juan J Tena; Esther González-Pérez; David Tran; Vydianathan Ravi; Byrappa Venkatesh; Sonsoles Campuzano; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Metazoan promoters: emerging characteristics and insights into transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Boris Lenhard; Albin Sandelin; Piero Carninci
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Evolution of a genomic regulatory domain: the role of gene co-option and gene duplication in the Enhancer of split complex.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Duncan; Peter K Dearden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Marcin von Grotthuss; Michael Ashburner; José M Ranz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  The random versus fragile breakage models of chromosome evolution: a matter of resolution.

Authors:  Thomas S Becker; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Automated identification of conserved synteny after whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Julian M Catchen; John S Conery; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Using retroviruses as a mutagenesis tool to explore the zebrafish genome.

Authors:  Li-En Jao; Lisette Maddison; Wenbiao Chen; Shawn M Burgess
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2008-10-31

Review 8.  A systems view of genetics in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keller; Sebastian Martini; John R Sedor; Matthias Kretzler
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Genomic regulatory blocks underlie extensive microsynteny conservation in insects.

Authors:  Pär G Engström; Shannan J Ho Sui; Oyvind Drivenes; Thomas S Becker; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Long-range gene regulation links genomic type 2 diabetes and obesity risk regions to HHEX, SOX4, and IRX3.

Authors:  Anja Ragvin; Enrico Moro; David Fredman; Pavla Navratilova; Øyvind Drivenes; Pär G Engström; M Eva Alonso; Elisa de la Calle Mustienes; José Luis Gómez Skarmeta; Maria J Tavares; Fernando Casares; Miguel Manzanares; Veronica van Heyningen; Anders Molven; Pål R Njølstad; Francesco Argenton; Boris Lenhard; Thomas S Becker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.