Literature DB >> 14711706

Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.

Mihai Pop1, Yves Payette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the preoperative risk factors for night vision complaints (NVCs) after LASIK in a clinical setting.
DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred ninety-five patients (1488 eyes) who underwent LASIK for myopia up to -9.75 diopters (D) (from January 1 to December 31, 1999).
SETTING: Private clinic.
METHODS: A complete preoperative examination was performed. Patients had bilateral LASIK surgery using the Nidek EC-5000 non-wavefront guided slit-scanning excimer laser and the Moria LSK One microkeratome. Patients were observed postoperatively for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The reported NVCs for each eye were rated on a subjective scale based on functional visual comfort. Clinically important NVC odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Reports of NVCs decreased considerably from 25.6% at 1 month to 4.7% at 12 months postoperatively, at which time all patients reported similar NVCs in both eyes. Stratification of risk factors at 12 months postoperatively showed a 2.8-times increase in NVCs for initial myopia of >5 D, a 2.5-times increase for an optical zone of </=6.0 mm, and a 2.9-times increase for a postoperative spherical equivalent outside +/-0.5 D of emmetropia. The role of attempted spherical correction, age of the patient, and postoperative spherical equivalent had significant importance in logistic regression of the OR throughout the first postoperative year. In a stepwise logistic regression using 6- and 12-month data, attempted spherical correction and optical zone were the most predictive factors of NVCs (P<0.001). Pupil size at any month postoperatively was not statistically predictive of postoperative NVCs in any differential model involving it.
CONCLUSIONS: Attempted degree of spherical correction, age, optical zone, and postoperative spherical equivalent were major risk factors of NVCs throughout the first postoperative year, whereas pupil size was not. Future wavefront studies that characterize higher order aberrations might be helpful for understanding individual visual aberrations while predicting quality of vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711706     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; J Bühren; M Cichocki; T Kasper; E Terzi; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Night vision disturbances after refractive surgery: haloes are not just for angels.

Authors:  Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Quantitative evaluation of night vision and correlation of refractive and topographical parameters with glare after orthokeratology.

Authors:  Takashi Kojima; Asato Hasegawa; Syuya Hara; Rie Horai; Yoko Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakamura; Murat Dogru; Kazuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual outcomes of topography-guided excimer laser surgery for treatment of patients with irregular astigmatism.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghoreishi; Afsaneh Naderi Beni; Zahra Naderi Beni
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Hyperopic Q-optimized algorithms: a theoretical study on factors influencing optical quality.

Authors:  Jose R Jiménez; Aixa Alarcón; Rosario G Anera; L Jiménez Del Barco
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Laser in situ keratomileusis application for myopia over minus 14 diopter with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Faik Oruçoğlu; James D Kingham; Mahir Kendüşim; Buket Ayoğlu; Berrin Toksu; Sinan Göker
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and mesopic pupil size in individuals screened for refractive surgery.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Hashemian; Mohammad Soleimani; Alireza Foroutan; Mahmood Joshaghani; Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah; Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method?

Authors:  Miguel J Maldonado; Alberto López-Miguel; David P Piñero; José R Juberías; Juan C Nieto; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Errors in Treatment of Lower-order Aberrations and Induction of Higher-order Aberrations in Laser Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Brad E Kligman; Brandon J Baartman; William J Dupps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.