Literature DB >> 17384220

Assessment of the frequency of allelic imbalance in human tissue using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction system.

Christopher M Heaphy1, William C Hines, Kimberly S Butler, Christina M Haaland, Glenroy Heywood, Edgar G Fischer, Marco Bisoffi, Jeffrey K Griffith.   

Abstract

Genomic instability can generate chromosome breakage and fusion randomly throughout the genome, frequently resulting in allelic imbalance, a deviation from the normal 1:1 ratio of maternal and paternal alleles. Allelic imbalance reflects the karyotypic complexity of the cancer genome. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that tissues with more sites of allelic imbalance have a greater likelihood of having disruption of any of the numerous critical genes that cause a cancerous phenotype and thus may have diagnostic or prognostic significance. For this reason, it is desirable to develop a robust method to assess the frequency of allelic imbalance in any tissue. To address this need, we designed an economical and high-throughput method, based on the Applied Biosystems AmpFlSTR Identifiler multiplex polymerase chain reaction system, to evaluate allelic imbalance at 16 unlinked, microsatellite loci located throughout the genome. This method provides a quantitative comparison of the extent of allelic imbalance between samples that can be applied to a variety of frozen and archival tissues. The method does not require matched normal tissue, requires little DNA (the equivalent of approximately 150 cells) and uses commercially available reagents, instrumentation, and analysis software. Greater than 99% of tissue specimens with >or=2 unbalanced loci were cancerous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17384220      PMCID: PMC1867446          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  25 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number.

Authors:  A M Snijders; N Nowak; R Segraves; S Blackwood; N Brown; J Conroy; G Hamilton; A K Hindle; B Huey; K Kimura; S Law; K Myambo; J Palmer; B Ylstra; J P Yue; J W Gray; A N Jain; D Pinkel; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Tumor suppressor genetics.

Authors:  Shannon R Payne; Christopher J Kemp
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Genome changes and gene expression in human solid tumors.

Authors:  J W Gray; C Collins
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Evaluation of loss of heterozygosity/allelic imbalance scoring in tumor DNA.

Authors:  R I Skotheim; C B Diep; S M Kraggerud; K S Jakobsen; R A Lothe
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2001-05

6.  Reliable high-throughput genotyping and loss-of-heterozygosity detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Esther H Lips; Jan Willem F Dierssen; Ronald van Eijk; Jan Oosting; Paul H C Eilers; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Eelco J de Graaf; Ruben van't Slot; Cisca Wijmenga; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Loss of heterozygosity assay for molecular detection of cancer using energy-transfer primers and capillary array electrophoresis.

Authors:  I L Medintz; C C Lee; W W Wong; K Pirkola; D Sidransky; R A Mathies
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  High-throughput loss of heterozygosity mapping in 26 commonly deleted regions in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; Darrell L Ellsworth; Susan M Lubert; Jeff Hooke; Richard I Somiari; Craig D Shriver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Profiling breast cancer by array CGH.

Authors:  Donna G Albertson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Genotyping pooled DNA using 100K SNP microarrays: a step towards genomewide association scans.

Authors:  Emma Meaburn; Lee M Butcher; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic instability demonstrates similarity between DCIS and invasive carcinomas.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Marco Bisoffi; Nancy E Joste; Kathy B Baumgartner; Richard N Baumgartner; Jeffrey K Griffith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Malignant tumors and forensics--dilemmas and proposals.

Authors:  Zoran Budimlija; Connie Lu; Grace Axler-DiPerte; Jessica Seifarth; Dorota Popiolek; Franz Fogt; Mechthild Prinz
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  High frequency of microsatellite instability and its substantial co-existence with KRAS and BRAF mutations in Vietnamese patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ha Thi Nguyen; Do Thanh Le; Quan Hong Duong; Vinay Bharadwaj Tatipamula; Bang Van Nguyen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.