Literature DB >> 1738240

Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

M Kouri1, S Pyrhönen, P Kuusela.   

Abstract

Tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 were analyzed as response indicators and prognostic factors in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Eighty-five patients participated in a phase II chemotherapy study from October 1984 to July 1990. A three-drug schedule was administered including low dose epirubicin and sequential methotrexate 5-fluorouracil, followed by leucovorin rescue. Serum specimens for CEA and CA19-9 were obtained prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, and subsequently at 4-6 weeks' intervals. In univariate analysis Karnofsky, the site of the primary tumor, the extent of metastases, the presence of abdominal or liver metastases, serum CEA (cut-off of 20 micrograms/l), and CA19-9 levels correlated with survival. In stepwise multivariate analysis an elevated CA19-9 level, a poor Karnofsky, and the presence of liver metastases were independent adverse prognostic factors. Tumors originating from the left colon had a better prognosis than the others. This was related to a higher response rate in this patient group. Serum CA19-9 level was the most significant prognostic factor whether it was entered as a continuous or as a dichotomized variable into the model. The median survival of patients with a normal CA19-9 level was 30.0 months (lower 95% confidence interval: 16.4 months; upper limit was not calculable), and with an elevated CA19-9 value 10.3 months (8.0-12.6 months, 95% confidence interval). Five of 85 patients had a complete response and 20 a partial response, the overall response rate being 29%. When compared with tumor shrinkage, "CEA response" and "CA19-9 response" had a sensitivity of 84% and 88% and specificity of 77% and 67%, respectively. In conclusion, serum CEA value seems to be the best tumor marker for response prediction, while CA19-9 level is one of the best available prognostic indicators in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738240     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930490204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  20 in total

1.  The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C X Zheng; W H Zhan; J Z Zhao; D Zheng; D P Wang; Y L He; Z Q Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Ca 19-9 in the monitoring of colorectal cancer after surgery.

Authors:  F Franchi; C Pastore; P Izzo; E Calió
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; Marcel C Machado; Dalia Wajsbrot; Roberto Abramoff; Paulo M Hoff; Jacques Tabacof; Artur Katz; Sergio D Simon; René C Gansl
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2002

4.  Implications of CEA and p53 overexpression in the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wesam A Nasif; Mahmoud Lotfy; Ibrahim H El-Sayed; Ayman El-Meghawry El-Kenawy; Mohamed El-Shahat; Nabil Gad El-Hak
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 correlate with radiological imaging in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Michl; J Koch; R P Laubender; D P Modest; C Giessen; Ch Schulz; V Heinemann
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are prognostic predictors of colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastasis.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Mitsuyama; Hiroaki Shiba; Koichiro Haruki; Yuki Fujiwara; Kenei Furukawa; Tomonori Iida; Takenori Hayashi; Masaichi Ogawa; Yuichi Ishida; Takeyuki Misawa; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Serum sialylation changes in cancer.

Authors:  Zejian Zhang; Manfred Wuhrer; Stephanie Holst
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.916

8.  Comparison between surgical outcomes of colorectal cancer in younger and elderly patients.

Authors:  Longxue Jin; Norio Inoue; Naoki Sato; Susumu Matsumoto; Hitoshi Kanno; Yuko Hashimoto; Kazuhiro Tasaki; Kinya Sato; Shun Sato; Katsutoshi Kaneko
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  L Assersohn; A Norman; D Cunningham; T Benepal; P J Ross; J Oates
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Discovery of sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X modified protein cancer biomarkers using high density antibody arrays.

Authors:  Jung-hyun Rho; Judson R Mead; W Shea Wright; Dean E Brenner; James W Stave; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve; Paul D Lampe
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.