Literature DB >> 16720924

Implications of CEA and p53 overexpression in the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Wesam A Nasif1, Mahmoud Lotfy, Ibrahim H El-Sayed, Ayman El-Meghawry El-Kenawy, Mohamed El-Shahat, Nabil Gad El-Hak.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and aggressive types of cancer. Several clinicopathologic features have been studied to identify the prognostic factors that can provide information concerning the favorable or the poor outcome of colorectal cancer. In the present study, the relationship between serum CEA, p53 expression, and DNA index to the different clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients was sought. Fifty patients with CRC were included in this study. p53 protein was detected immunohistochemically using specific monoclonal antibodies. Samples were investigated for DNA index using flow cytometry. In addition, the serum CEA was determined using ELISA. The results showed that 27/50 (54%) were positive for p53. Concerning CEA reactivity, it was found that 35/50 (70%) were reactive for CEA. These results indicate that CEA is more sensitive than p53 to detect colorectal cancer. There was a statistically significant difference between the recurrent and nonrecurrent groups in the CRC Duke's stages, survival time, serum CEA (p = 0.001, 0.016, < 0.001, respectively). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test showed that the mean survival time for cases positive for both p53 and CEA is significantly different from cases positive for CEA only, positive for p53 only, and negative for both p53 and CEA (p = 0.0002). Survival time was statistically significant with respect to sex, p53, CEA, and Duke's stages (p = 0.006, 0.024, 0.001, 0.017, respectively). Cox regression model showed that the prognosis of colorectal cancer is influenced by sex, p53, CEA reactivity, and CRC Duke's stages (p = 0.014, 0.006, 0.019, 0.014, respectively). In conclusion, the use of more than one tumor marker may successfully aid in the prediction of colorectal cancer prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720924     DOI: 10.1385/mo:23:2:237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  43 in total

1.  Clinical significance of CA19-9 in diagnosis of digestive tract tumors.

Authors:  J Z Zhao; B H Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sequence analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen: identification of glycosylation sites and homology with the immunoglobulin supergene family.

Authors:  R J Paxton; G Mooser; H Pande; T D Lee; J E Shively
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  p53 and K-ras gene mutations correlate with tumor aggressiveness but are not of routine prognostic value in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Tortola; E Marcuello; I González; G Reyes; R Arribas; G Aiza; F J Sancho; M A Peinado; G Capella
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Geriatric oncology: a clinical approach to the older patient with cancer.

Authors:  L Repetto; A Venturino; L Fratino; D Serraino; G Troisi; W Gianni; M Pietropaolo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Significance of serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen for the prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients.

Authors:  D Y Kim; H R Kim; J H Shim; C S Park; S K Kim; Y J Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Prognosis and response to therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Walker; P Quirke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  R H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Database of p53 gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines.

Authors:  M Hollstein; K Rice; M S Greenblatt; T Soussi; R Fuchs; T Sørlie; E Hovig; B Smith-Sørensen; R Montesano; C C Harris
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  M Kouri; S Pyrhönen; P Kuusela
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 10.  Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  A M Ballesta; R Molina; X Filella; J Jo; N Giménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1995
View more
  8 in total

1.  Implication of K-ras and p53 in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis in Tunisian population cohort.

Authors:  Chaar Ines; Ounissi Donia; Boughriba Rahma; Azza Ben Ammar; Amara Sameh; Taher Khalfallah; Ben Hmida Abdelmajid; Mzabi Sabeh; Bouraoui Saadia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-25

2.  Targeting self and neo-epitopes with a modular self-adjuvanting cancer vaccine.

Authors:  Elodie Belnoue; Jean-François Mayol; Susanna Carboni; Wilma Di Berardino Besson; Eloise Dupuychaffray; Annika Nelde; Stefan Stevanovic; Marie-Laure Santiago-Raber; Paul R Walker; Madiha Derouazi
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-04-23

3.  Neutrophil elastase as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Ai-Sheng Ho; Chien-Hsin Chen; Chun-Chia Cheng; Chia-Chi Wang; Hua-Ching Lin; Tsai-Yueh Luo; Gi-Shih Lien; Jungshan Chang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-01-30

4.  The association of p53 expression levels with clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with colon cancer following surgery.

Authors:  Da-Zhong Cao; Xi-Long Ou; Ting Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  GRHL3 Promotes Tumor Growth and Metastasis via the MEK Pathway in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Lin Tan; Weiming Qu; Dajun Wu; Minji Liu; Qian Wang; Qiongjia Ai; Hongsai Hu; Min Chen; Weishun Chen; Hongbing Zhou
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.916

6.  Prognostic Implication of Preoperative Serum Albumin to Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mingyue Xu; You Liu; Tianhui Xue; Qianwen Ye; Jia Xiang; Long Liu; Bing Yan
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

7.  The Prognostic Impact of p53 Expression on Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Is Dependent on p21 Status.

Authors:  Martin Kruschewski; Kathrin Mueller; Sybille Lipka; Jan Budczies; Aurelia Noske; Heinz Johannes Buhr; Sefer Elezkurtaj
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Prognostic implications of EGFR protein expression in sporadic colorectal tumors: Correlation with copy number status, mRNA levels and miRNA regulation.

Authors:  Sofía Del Carmen; Luís Antonio Corchete; Ruth Gervas; Alba Rodriguez; María Garcia; José Antonio Álcazar; Jacinto García; Oscar Bengoechea; Luis Muñoz-Bellvis; José María Sayagués; Mar Abad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.