Literature DB >> 1738046

Efficiency of stereopsis in random-dot stereograms.

J M Harris1, A J Parker.   

Abstract

The statistical efficiency of stereopsis was investigated by measurement of the discriminability d' of a step edge in depth in a random-dot stereogram and its comparison with d' calculated for an ideal observer model. Efficiencies of approximately 20% were found for stimuli with very few (less than 30) dots. As the number of dots was increased, efficiency fell markedly to 2% and below. Over the ranges explored in this study, there was little variation in efficiency with changes in dot density (with dot number constant) or stimulus size. Efficiency loss was also found to be almost entirely due to incomplete use of the available information rather than to intrinsic observer variance. Results were compared with two simple models that implemented possible detection strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738046     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.9.000014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  7 in total

1.  Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Peter J Bex; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Cue integration outside central fixation: a study of grasping in depth.

Authors:  Hal S Greenwald; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Harold T Nefs; Louise O'Hare; Julie M Harris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-12

7.  Responses to interocular disparity correlation in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Ifan Betina Ip; Loredana Minini; James Dow; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.