Literature DB >> 17378416

The ground dominance effect in the perception of relative distance in 3-D scenes is mainly due to characteristics of the ground surface.

Zheng Bian1, Myron L Braunstein, George J Andersen.   

Abstract

Previously, we (Bian, Braunstein, and& Andersen, 2005) reported a dominance effect of the ground plane over other environmental surfaces in determining the perceived relative distance of objects in 3-D scenes. In the present study, we conducted three experiments to investigate whether this ground dominance is due to inherent differences between ground and ceiling surfaces, or to the locations of these surfaces in the visual field. In Experiment 1, two vertical posts were positioned between a ground surface and a ceiling surface, and optical contact was manipulated so that the two surfaces provided contradictory information about the relative distances of the posts from the participant. The two surfaces were either both above, both below, or one above and one below fixation. In Experiment 2, only one surface was presented, either above, below, or at fixation. In Experiment 3, the posts were replaced by two red dots, and the eccentricity of the optical contact on the two surfaces was equated in each of five locations in the visual field. In all three experiments, participants judged which of the two objects appeared to be closer. Overall, we found a higher proportion of judgments consistent with a ground surface than with a ceiling surface in all locations, indicating that the ground dominance effect is mainly due to characteristics of the ground surface, with location in the visual field having only a minor effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17378416     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Environmental surfaces and the compression of perceived visual space.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Gaze behavior and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation.

Authors:  Marcia Bécu; Denis Sheynikhovich; Guillaume Tatur; Catherine Persephone Agathos; Luca Leonardo Bologna; José-Alain Sahel; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Aging and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  The visible ground surface as a reference frame for scaling binocular depth of a target in midair.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Liu Zhou; Pan Shi; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Change detection for objects on surfaces slanted in depth.

Authors:  Kerem Ozkan; Myron L Braunstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The advantage of a ground surface in the representation of visual scenes.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.