Lars Lund1, Morten Jønler. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Viborg Hospital, Heibergs alle, Viborg, Denmark. Dr.LL@Dadlnet.dk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is the preferred and gentlest type of dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). One of the most frequent complications following peritoneal dialysis catheter (P-catheter) placement is malfunction owing to displacement, which frequently entails major problems for the patient, including reoperation and the risk of having to switch to haemodialysis. Consequently, to ensure optimal P-catheter function and reduce patient morbidity, it is essential to develop and assess new surgical techniques for dialysis catheter placement. The objective of this survey is to describe and assess a laparoscopic-assisted procedure for P-catheter placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey of laparoscopic-assisted P-catheter placements performed during a one-year period. The study describes the operative procedure, catheter function and complications. Furthermore, a comparison with open surgery performed in the period is made. RESULTS: One of nine P-catheters inserted using laparoscopic-assisted surgery under general anaesthesia was displaced while four of 13 P-catheters inserted using traditional open surgery under local anaesthesia were displaced. The five displaced catheters were subsequently fixed laparoscopically under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic P-catheter placement is uncomplicated, quick and reduces P-catheter displacement frequency. Drawbacks include costly equipment and the need for general anaesthesia. Future follow-up will reveal whether laparoscopically placed P-catheters yield longer-lasting and better-functioning catheters than traditionally placed P-catheters.
UNLABELLED: Peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is the preferred and gentlest type of dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). One of the most frequent complications following peritoneal dialysis catheter (P-catheter) placement is malfunction owing to displacement, which frequently entails major problems for the patient, including reoperation and the risk of having to switch to haemodialysis. Consequently, to ensure optimal P-catheter function and reduce patient morbidity, it is essential to develop and assess new surgical techniques for dialysis catheter placement. The objective of this survey is to describe and assess a laparoscopic-assisted procedure for P-catheter placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survey of laparoscopic-assisted P-catheter placements performed during a one-year period. The study describes the operative procedure, catheter function and complications. Furthermore, a comparison with open surgery performed in the period is made. RESULTS: One of nine P-catheters inserted using laparoscopic-assisted surgery under general anaesthesia was displaced while four of 13 P-catheters inserted using traditional open surgery under local anaesthesia were displaced. The five displaced catheters were subsequently fixed laparoscopically under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic P-catheter placement is uncomplicated, quick and reduces P-catheter displacement frequency. Drawbacks include costly equipment and the need for general anaesthesia. Future follow-up will reveal whether laparoscopically placed P-catheters yield longer-lasting and better-functioning catheters than traditionally placed P-catheters.
Authors: S J Savader; G Lund; P J Scheel; C Prescott; N Feeley; H Singh; F A Osterman Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: J Rassweiler; P Fornara; M Weber; G Janetschek; D Fahlenkamp; T Henkel; M Beer; W Stackl; W Boeckmann; F Recker; A Lampel; C Fischer; U Humke; K Miller Journal: J Urol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Tiffany C Cox; Laurel J Blair; Ciara R Huntington; Tanushree Prasad; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sander M Hagen; Jeffrey A Lafranca; Ewout W Steyerberg; Jan N M IJzermans; Frank J M F Dor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240