Literature DB >> 9399464

Guide wire directed manipulation of malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters: a critical analysis.

S J Savader1, G Lund, P J Scheel, C Prescott, N Feeley, H Singh, F A Osterman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate patency rates after guide wire directed manipulation of malfunctioning continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 58-month period, 23 patients underwent 34 outpatient guide wire directed manipulations of their CAPD catheter to improve function (n = 30) or reduce pain and improve function (n = 4) during dialysis. Catheter patency rates were subsequently determined by review of departmental, hospital, and dialysis center charts; procedural reports; and patient telephone interviews.
RESULTS: Among 12 patients who underwent a single guide wire directed manipulation, long-term (> 30 days) catheter patency was achieved in seven (58%). With use of the Kaplan-Meier survival method, the 3-, 6-, and 12-month probability of patency after a single guide wire manipulation was 0.61, 0.54, and 0.11, respectively. The mean duration of patency achieved in this group was 131 days (range, 2-421 days). In those patients (n = 8) who underwent multiple catheter manipulations (n = 19), 11 (58%) procedures resulted in long-term patency, with each patient (100%) achieving at least one such period. The Kaplan-Meier survival method determined the probability of patency in this group at 3, 6, and 12 months to be 0.75, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively. The mean secondary catheter patency was 235 days (range, 2-646 days). Overall, 75% of patients followed up achieved at least one period of long-term catheter patency during the time of this study. One (3%) episode of postprocedure peritonitis occurred.
CONCLUSION: Guide wire directed CAPD catheter manipulation is a relatively simple outpatient procedure that restores long-term catheter function for most patients with minimal risk for a major complication. Patients with nonfunctioning CAPD catheters who do not have peritonitis or sepsis will most likely benefit from at least one attempt at radiologic manipulation of their catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9399464     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70693-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic correction and fixation of displaced peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Morten Jønler; Lars Lund; Helle Kyrval
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Fluoroscopic manipulation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: outcomes and factors associated with successful manipulation.

Authors:  Matthew Miller; Brendan McCormick; Susan Lavoie; Mohan Biyani; Deborah Zimmerman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Best practices consensus protocol for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists.

Authors:  Ahmed K Abdel-Aal; Paul Dybbro; Peter Hathaway; Steven Guest; Michael Neuwirth; Venkat Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Haggerty; Scott Roth; Danielle Walsh; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Raymond Price; Robert D Fanelli; Todd Penner; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Peritoneal Dialysis Access Revision in Children: Causes, Interventions, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Dagmara Borzych-Duzalka; T Fazil Aki; Marta Azocar; Colin White; Elizabeth Harvey; Sevgi Mir; Marta Adragna; Erkin Serdaroglu; Rajiv Sinha; Charlotte Samaille; Juan Jose Vanegas; Jameela Kari; Lorena Barbosa; Arvind Bagga; Monica Galanti; Onder Yavascan; Giovanna Leozappa; Maria Szczepanska; Karel Vondrak; Kei-Chiu Tse; Franz Schaefer; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: is laparoscopy an option?

Authors:  Lars Lund; Morten Jønler
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Percutaneous placement and management of peritoneovenous shunts.

Authors:  Louis G Martin
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications.

Authors:  Arnoud Peppelenbosch; Willy H M van Kuijk; Nicole D Bouvy; Frank M van der Sande; Jan H M Tordoir
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

9.  Minimally invasive fluoroscopic percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage.

Authors:  Rajeev Narayan; Terrance Fried; Gerardo Chica; Mathew Schaefer; Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2014-06

10.  Outcomes of fluoroscopic and ultrasound-guided placement versus laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Ahmed K Abdel Aal; Steven S Guest; Sherif Moawad; Khalid Mahmoud; Bradford Jackson; Peter M Rageeb; Islam H Shawali; Asmaa E Mokhtar; Basant F Hamed; Doaa Attia; Nathan Ertel; Ammar Almehmi
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-12-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.