Literature DB >> 9628596

Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association.

J Rassweiler1, P Fornara, M Weber, G Janetschek, D Fahlenkamp, T Henkel, M Beer, W Stackl, W Boeckmann, F Recker, A Lampel, C Fischer, U Humke, K Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The centers of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association collected data to prove the efficacy, safety and reproducibility of laparoscopic nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 14 centers 482 laparoscopic nephrectomies have been performed until December 1996 via a transperitoneal approach in 344 (71%) and a retroperitoneal approach in 138 (29%). All 482 laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed by a total of 20 surgeons with an average of 24 procedures per surgeon (range 4 to 105). The indications for nephrectomy were benign renal pathology in 444 patients (92%), including renovascular disease in 28%, hydronephrosis in 20%, reflux nephropathy in 15%, chronic pyelonephritis in 12%, end stage nephrolithiasis in 11%, renal dysplasia in 4% and renal tuberculosis in 1%. Of the remaining 38 patients (8%) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed for renal cell carcinoma in 5% and for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in 3%.
RESULTS: Operating time depended mainly on the pathology of the kidney (that is small dysplastic organ versus large hydronephrosis) and the learning curve of the surgeon. However, the average operating time did not vary significantly among the different centers (maximum 277.6 and minimum 81.9 minutes). Intraoperative or perioperative complications were noted in 29 patients (6.0%), including bleeding in 22 (4.6%), bowel injury in 3, hypercarbia in 2 and pleura lesion in 1 and pulmonary embolism in 1. The conversion rate was 10.3% (bleeding, bowel injury, difficult dissection), including 4 patients with renal tuberculosis, 2 with xanthogranulomatous nephritis, and 1 each following renal trauma and embolization. The re-intervention rate was 3.4% due to bleeding in 6 cases, abscess formation in 3, intestinal stenosis in 2 and a pancreatic fistula and port hernia in 1. Mean hospital stay was 5.4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy has become a well established procedure in those urology departments focusing on laparoscopy. The indications and results are reproducible at these centers. However, for patients with severe perinephritis (that is renal tuberculosis, xanthogranulomatous nephritis, posttraumatic atrophy) a higher likelihood of open conversion must be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628596     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63015-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

Review 1.  Retroperitoneal renal laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy patient with situs inversus totalis and left renal hypoplasia: A case report.

Authors:  Haci Ibrahim Cimen; Yavuz Tarik Atik; Oztug Adsan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Nephrectomy for multicystic dysplastic kidneys: a new therapeutic option.

Authors:  Kazunari Kaneko; Yuichiro Yamashiro; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Takeshi Miyano
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  [The value of laparoscopic kidney surgery in urology].

Authors:  A Jurczok; A Hamza; A Nill; H-P Gerbershagen; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Laparoscopic renal surgery for benign disease.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Alberto Breda; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

Authors:  R C Calvert; M M Morsy; B Zelhof; M Rhodes; N A Burgess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML).

Authors:  A N Georgiou; J Rassweiler; T R Herrmann; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; Eta Mu Do; P Kallidonis; A de la Teille; R van Velthoven; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E A Lassel; R Rao; C Schwenke; S O Schoenberg; H J Michaely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: is laparoscopy an option?

Authors:  Lars Lund; Morten Jønler
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Pushing the Envelope: Laparoscopic Nephrectomy as Outpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Nessn H Azawi; Tom Christensen; Claus Dahl; Lars Lund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.