Literature DB >> 1737383

CA 72-4 measurement of tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) as a serum marker in the management of gastric carcinoma.

F Guadagni1, M Roselli, T Amato, M Cosimelli, P Perri, V Casale, M Carlini, E Santoro, R Cavaliere, J W Greiner.   

Abstract

The presence of three distinct serum markers of carcinoma, tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72; as measured by the CA 72-4 assay), CA 19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), was evaluated in 194 patients diagnosed with either malignant (n = 94) or benign (n = 100) gastric disease. Of the 94 patients diagnosed with gastric carcinoma, the percentage of patients whose serum samples were positive for TAG-72, CA 19-9, or CEA was 42.6, 31.9, and 20.2%, respectively. Furthermore, fewer false positive samples were observed for TAG-72 than either CA 19-9 or CEA. The analysis of serum TAG-72, CA 19-9, and CEA levels in patients diagnosed with early (stage I and II) versus advanced (stage III and IV) disease revealed a significantly higher level of TAG-72 and CA 19-9 in the serum of patients with advanced stage gastric carcinoma. The serum samples were also analyzed to determine whether any advantage might be gained by simultaneously measuring two or more of the tumor markers. The data clearly indicate that the measurement of TAG-72 with CA 19-9 significantly increased the percentage of gastric carcinoma patients with positive serum levels of either antigen. This advantage was achieved with no significant increase in the number of false positives. Twenty-one patients were followed postsurgically for up to 3 years to determine whether the appearance or reappearance of TAG-72, CA 19-9, or CEA accurately predicted disease recurrence. Positive serum TAG-72 levels correlated with disease recurrence in 7 of 10 patients, compared with 5 and 2 patients for CA 19-9 and CEA, respectively. The findings suggest that serum TAG-72 as measured by the CA 72-4 assay may be a useful marker for late stage gastric carcinoma and its measurement alone or in combination with CA 19-9 may have utility in the clinical management of gastric carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1737383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  12 in total

1.  Detection of perioperative cancer antigen 72-4 in gastric juice pre- and post-distal gastrectomy and its significances.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Aman Xu; Tuanjie Li; Wenxiu Han; Shanshan Wu; Yangyi Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population.

Authors:  Xin-Zu Chen; Wei-Ke Zhang; Kun Yang; Lan-Lan Wang; Jin Liu; Li Wang; Jian-Kun Hu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Xian-Ming Mo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Identification and validation that up-expression of HOXA13 is a novel independent prognostic marker of a worse outcome in gastric cancer based on immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Yang Han; Wei-Wei Tu; Yu-Gang Wen; Da-Peng Li; Guo-Qiang Qiu; Hua-Mei Tang; Zhi-Hai Peng; Chong-Zhi Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Tamaki Noie; Manabu Ohashi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  Increase in the circulating level of hepatocyte growth factor in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  T Taniguchi; M Kitamura; K Arai; Y Iwasaki; Y Yamamoto; A Igari; M Toi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Preoperative serum tumor marker levels in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Erdal Polat; Ugur Duman; Mustafa Duman; Kivanc Derya Peker; Cebrail Akyuz; Necdet Fatih Yasar; Orhan Uzun; Sabiye Akbulut; Erdal Birol Bostanci; Sinan Yol
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  The distinctive gastric fluid proteome in gastric cancer reveals a multi-biomarker diagnostic profile.

Authors:  Oi Lian Kon; Tai-Tung Yip; Meng Fatt Ho; Weng Hoong Chan; Wai Keong Wong; Soo Yong Tan; Wai Har Ng; Siok Yuen Kam; Alvin Kh Eng; Patrick Ho; Rosa Viner; Hock Soo Ong; M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Mucin-associated sialosyl-Tn antigen expression in gastric cancer correlates with an adverse outcome.

Authors:  J L Werther; S Rivera-MacMurray; H Bruckner; M Tatematsu; S H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A new serum tumor marker, CAM 123-6, highly specific to pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  H Hamada; N Kohno; K Hiwada
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1994-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.