Literature DB >> 3128372

Audit of a surgical firm by microcomputer: five years' experience.

D C Dunn1.   

Abstract

From 1982 to 1986 inclusive work of one surgical firm was audited with a microcomputer. Data were recorded on 4336 patients having 3355 operations, who were under the care of one consultant in a general surgical unit; fifty items of information were recorded on each patient, allowing a wide range of analyses to be performed--for example, the number of admissions and operations, grades of operation, diagnostic grouping, complications, and complication rates associated with individual surgeons. Data collected for the audit provided a valuable baseline for the unit, defining aspects of practice that could be reviewed and improved. During the audit the overall rate of complications as a percentage of admissions fell significantly from 13% to 9% and the rate of postoperative complications decreased significantly from 16% in 1982 to 11% in 1986. The incidence of chest and wound infections also decreased significantly. The system was improved by using the data to produce discharge summaries as well as audit; the microcomputer thus became an integral part of the office work of the unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3128372      PMCID: PMC2545351          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6623.687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  7 in total

1.  Surgical audit: one year's experience in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  M Irving; J Temple
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

2.  Combined computer generated discharge documents and surgical audit.

Authors:  D C Dunn; R F Dale
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-22

3.  The establishment of a microcomputer-based diagnosis and operations index in the Department of Surgery of a district general hospital.

Authors:  W G Prout; P A Blood
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The use of a microcomputer for inpatient audit in an orthopaedic department.

Authors:  N S Broughton; T D Bunker; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Audit: an annual assessment of the work and performance of a surgical firm in a regional teaching hospital.

Authors:  M H Gough; M G Kettlewell; C G Marks; S J Holmes; J Holderness
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-04

6.  Surgical audit: Comparison of the work load and results of two hospitals in the same district.

Authors:  O J Gilmore; N J Griffiths; J C Connolly; A W Dunlop; S Hart; J P Thomson; I P Todd
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-10-18

7.  Surgical audit in a district general hospital: a stimulus for improving patient care.

Authors:  R E Glass; P A Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

  7 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.

Authors:  M Morgan; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve.

Authors:  Eelco J Veen; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Loek P H Leenen; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Computers in audit: servants or sirens?

Authors:  I K Crombie; H T Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

4.  Medical audit data: counting is not enough.

Authors:  S N Voss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-21

5.  Audit in medical practice.

Authors:  N O'Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Markers of data quality in computer audit: the Manchester Orthopaedic Database.

Authors:  D Ricketts; M Newey; M Patterson; D Hitchin; S Fowler
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Computerised administration in an intensive care unit. Experience with a personal computer system.

Authors:  R J Marks; C Morgan; G Duce
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.

Authors:  J L Barrie; D R Marsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-18

9.  Medical audit data: counting is not enough.

Authors:  C Lyons; R Gumpert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-16

10.  Surgical audit under scrutiny--a prospective study.

Authors:  M G Davies; M F Shine; F Lennon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.