Literature DB >> 17370333

Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and King's College Hospital criteria.

Radha K Dhiman1, Sanjay Jain, Uma Maheshwari, Ashish Bhalla, Navneet Sharma, Jasmina Ahluwalia, Ajay Duseja, Yogesh Chawla.   

Abstract

While King's Hospital Criteria (KCH) criteria are used worldwide, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is a more recently developed scoring system that has been validated as an independent predictor of patient survival in conditions for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of the present study was to compare MELD and KCH criteria with other early clinical prognostic indicators (CPI) in a cohort of patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). A total of 144 patients (mean age 31.7 +/- 14.7 yr; range 12-82 yr; 62 males) with FHF due to acute viral hepatitis were included into the study. Variables found significant on univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 52 (36.1%) patients survived, the remaining 92 (63.9%) died. Univariate analysis showed that age, duration of jaundice, jaundice-encephalopathy interval (JEI), grade of encephalopathy, presence of cerebral edema, bilirubin, prothrombin time, creatinine, and MELD score were significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors. Multivariate logistic regression identified 6 independent CPI of adverse outcome on admission: age >or=50 yr, JEI >7 days, grade 3 or 4 encephalopathy, presence of cerebral edema, prothrombin time >or=35 seconds, and creatinine >or=1.5 mg/dL. Presence of any 3 of 6 CPI was optimum in identifying survivors and nonsurvivors. A MELD score of >or=33 was found to be best discriminant between survivors and nonsurvivors by the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Any 3 CPI were superior to MELD and KCH criteria in predicting the outcome (c-statistic [95% confidence interval]: CPI 0.802 [0.726-0.878], MELD 0.717 [0.636-0.789], and KCH criteria 0.676 (0.588-0.764); P values: CPI vs. MELD 0.045, CPI vs. KCH criteria 0.019, and MELD vs. KCH criteria 0.472). In conclusion, MELD and KCH criteria are not as useful as a combination of other early CPI in predicting adverse outcome in patients with FHF due to acute viral hepatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17370333     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  28 in total

1.  Outcome of acute liver failure in the elderly.

Authors:  Frank V Schiødt; Raymond T Chung; Michael L Schilsky; J Eileen Hay; Erik Christensen; William M Lee
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Circulating levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and ligands of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in patients with acute liver failure.

Authors:  Giuseppina Basta; Serena Del Turco; Teresa Navarra; William M Lee
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  End-stage liver disease patients with MELD >40 have higher waitlist mortality compared to Status 1A patients.

Authors:  Joseph Ahn; Taft Bhuket; Sasan Mosadeghi; Catherine Frenette; Benny Liu; Robert J Wong
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  Liver Transplantation in India: At the Crossroads.

Authors:  Sanjay Nagral; Aditya Nanavati; Aabha Nagral
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-12

5.  Factors associated with outcome in acute liver failure in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Banani Poddar; Saurabh Saigal; Anand Kumar; Ratender K Singh; Afzal Azim; Mohan Gurjar; Arvind Baronia
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-11

6.  Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in China.

Authors:  Ding Yuan; Fei Liu; Yong-Gang Wei; Bo Li; Lv-Nan Yan; Tian-Fu Wen; Ji-Chun Zhao; Yong Zeng; Ke-Fei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Development of an accurate index for predicting outcomes of patients with acute liver failure.

Authors:  Anna Rutherford; Lindsay Y King; Linda S Hynan; Chetan Vedvyas; Wenyu Lin; William M Lee; Raymond T Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  A new prognostic formula for adult acute liver failure using computer tomography-derived hepatic volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yamagishi; Hidetsugu Saito; Hirotoshi Ebinuma; Masahiro Kikuchi; Keisuke Ojiro; Hideaki Kanamori; Shinichiro Tada; Yoshinori Horie; Shinzo Kato; Toshifumi Hibi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Evaluation of a scoring system for assessing prognosis in pediatric acute liver failure.

Authors:  Brandy R Lu; Jane Gralla; Edwin Liu; Emily L Dobyns; Michael R Narkewicz; Ronald J Sokol
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure in Presence of Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Neeraj Saraf; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.