Joseph Ahn1, Taft Bhuket2, Sasan Mosadeghi2, Catherine Frenette3, Benny Liu2, Robert J Wong4. 1. School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital-Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA. 3. Department of Organ Transplantation, Scripps Green Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital-Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA. Rowong@alamedahealthsystem.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Status 1A patients are prioritized over end-stage liver disease (ESLD) for liver transplantation (LT). ESLD patients with high MELD may have higher waitlist mortality than Status 1A patients, and may require LT more urgently. METHODS: Using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data, we retrospectively evaluated LT waitlist mortality and probability of LT between adults in the United States with Status 1A or ESLD with MELD >30 listed for LT from 2003-2013. Overall waitlist mortality and probability of LT were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: From 2003-2013, 15,049 ESLD patients with MELD >30 and 3049 Status 1A patients were listed for LT. While overall 14-day waitlist survival decreased with increasing MELD score among ESLD patients (54.0 % for MELD 31-35; 37.1 % for MELD 36-40; 27.5 % for MELD >40), overall survival at 14 days was significantly lower among Status 1A (14.4 %). Compared to Status 1A, ESLD patients with MELD >40 had significantly higher 14-day waitlist mortality (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 1.56-2.36; p < 0.001), whereas ESLD patients with MELD 36-40 had a non-significant trend towards higher waitlist mortality (OR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.93-1.45; p = 0.181). No difference in probability of LT within 14 days was observed between ESLD with MELD >40 and Status 1A (p = 0.89). ESLD patients with MELD >40 had higher post-LT survival compared to Status 1A on multivariate regression modeling (HR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.66-0.96; p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among adults in the United States awaiting LT, ESLD patients with MELD >40 have significantly higher waitlist mortality, but similar probability of receiving LT compared to Status 1A patients.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Status 1A patients are prioritized over end-stage liver disease (ESLD) for liver transplantation (LT). ESLD patients with high MELD may have higher waitlist mortality than Status 1A patients, and may require LT more urgently. METHODS: Using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data, we retrospectively evaluated LT waitlist mortality and probability of LT between adults in the United States with Status 1A or ESLD with MELD >30 listed for LT from 2003-2013. Overall waitlist mortality and probability of LT were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: From 2003-2013, 15,049 ESLD patients with MELD >30 and 3049 Status 1A patients were listed for LT. While overall 14-day waitlist survival decreased with increasing MELD score among ESLD patients (54.0 % for MELD 31-35; 37.1 % for MELD 36-40; 27.5 % for MELD >40), overall survival at 14 days was significantly lower among Status 1A (14.4 %). Compared to Status 1A, ESLD patients with MELD >40 had significantly higher 14-day waitlist mortality (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 1.56-2.36; p < 0.001), whereas ESLD patients with MELD 36-40 had a non-significant trend towards higher waitlist mortality (OR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.93-1.45; p = 0.181). No difference in probability of LT within 14 days was observed between ESLD with MELD >40 and Status 1A (p = 0.89). ESLD patients with MELD >40 had higher post-LT survival compared to Status 1A on multivariate regression modeling (HR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.66-0.96; p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among adults in the United States awaiting LT, ESLD patients with MELD >40 have significantly higher waitlist mortality, but similar probability of receiving LT compared to Status 1A patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Liver failure; Liver transplantation; Status 1A; UNOS/OPTN; Waitlist survival
Authors: W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; M A Skeans; D P Schladt; E B Edwards; A M Harper; J L Wainright; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Ramsey Cheung; Ryan B Perumpail; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Aijaz Ahmed Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Robert M Merion; Douglas E Schaubel; Dawn M Dykstra; Richard B Freeman; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Walter K Kremers; Marrije van IJperen; W Ray Kim; Richard B Freeman; Ann M Harper; Patrick S Kamath; Russell H Wiesner Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Olivia S Kates; Cynthia E Fisher; Robert M Rakita; Jorge D Reyes; Ajit P Limaye Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 9.369
Authors: Mohamed M NasrAllah; Noha A Osman; Mahmoud Elalfy; Paolo Malvezzi; Lionel Rostaing Journal: Rev Med Virol Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 11.043