BACKGROUND: Enhancing patient participation is a priority for renal services. Good quality information is fundamental to facilitate patient involvement, but in other health contexts it has been found to be sub-optimal. This research aims to audit the provision of patient information by renal units and charities and to assess the quality of written information about dialysis treatment options. METHODS: All UK renal units were sent a questionnaire about the patient information they provided. Renal units and charities that provided dialysis leaflets were asked to forward copies. Leaflet quality and content were assessed by a coding frame informed by information and decision aid checklists. RESULTS: Out of 105, 67 completed questionnaires were returned. Services provide patients with large amounts of information in several media (leaflets, meetings with nurses and patients, videos); computers were not used frequently. Out of 47, 32 units forwarded leaflets about dialysis, and 31 different leaflets. Most leaflets were difficult to understand and rarely included risk information or treatment limitations. No leaflets included techniques to assist patient involvement or decision-making; their primary goal was to inform. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest an unsystematic pattern of information provision across the UK. Vast resources have been spent on providing information to patients that is difficult to comprehend and incomplete. Research needs to identify which resources are effective in meeting patient needs and at what point in their illness. A centralized system to guide renal services in the design and development of information resources may help meet the differing goals of education, choice facilitation and preparation for self-management.
BACKGROUND: Enhancing patient participation is a priority for renal services. Good quality information is fundamental to facilitate patient involvement, but in other health contexts it has been found to be sub-optimal. This research aims to audit the provision of patient information by renal units and charities and to assess the quality of written information about dialysis treatment options. METHODS: All UK renal units were sent a questionnaire about the patient information they provided. Renal units and charities that provided dialysis leaflets were asked to forward copies. Leaflet quality and content were assessed by a coding frame informed by information and decision aid checklists. RESULTS: Out of 105, 67 completed questionnaires were returned. Services provide patients with large amounts of information in several media (leaflets, meetings with nurses and patients, videos); computers were not used frequently. Out of 47, 32 units forwarded leaflets about dialysis, and 31 different leaflets. Most leaflets were difficult to understand and rarely included risk information or treatment limitations. No leaflets included techniques to assist patient involvement or decision-making; their primary goal was to inform. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest an unsystematic pattern of information provision across the UK. Vast resources have been spent on providing information to patients that is difficult to comprehend and incomplete. Research needs to identify which resources are effective in meeting patient needs and at what point in their illness. A centralized system to guide renal services in the design and development of information resources may help meet the differing goals of education, choice facilitation and preparation for self-management.
Authors: Mario Prieto-Velasco; Corinne Isnard Bagnis; Jessica Dean; Tony Goovaerts; Stefan Melander; Andrew Mooney; Eva-Lena Nilsson; Peter Rutherford; Carmen Trujillo; Roberto Zambon; Carlo Crepaldi Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2014-10-17
Authors: Patrick Peeters; Wim Van Biesen; Nic Veys; Wim Lemahieu; Bart De Moor; Johan De Meester Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Anna E Winterbottom; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Andrew Mooney; Martin Wilkie; Simon J Davies; Dennis Crane; Ken Tupling; Paul D Baxter; David M Meads; Nigel Mathers; Hilary L Bekker Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Barnaby Hole; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Edwina Brown; Mark Brown; Mignon I McCulloch; Carlos Zuniga; Sharon P Andreoli; Peter G Blake; Cécile Couchoud; Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano; Gavin Dreyer; Guillermo Garcia Garcia; Kitty J Jager; Marla McKnight; Rachael L Morton; Fliss E M Murtagh; Saraladevi Naicker; Gregorio T Obrador; Jeffrey Perl; Muhibur Rahman; Kamal D Shah; Wim Van Biesen; Rachael C Walker; Karen Yeates; Alexander Zemchenkov; Ming-Hui Zhao; Simon J Davies; Fergus J Caskey Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Date: 2020-02-19