Literature DB >> 17925141

The lure of 'patient choice'.

Louise D Bryant1, Nicola Bown, Hilary L Bekker, Allan House.   

Abstract

As primary care practitioners are the health professionals closest to patients' everyday lives, they are most likely to experience the impact of policies that support the patient choice agenda. The government's approach to increasing patient choice has been subject to criticism by those sceptical of its politics and by those concerned with its influence on health providers and some patient groups. A perspective missing from the debate is one informed by research on the psychology of choice. Some psychologists have argued that a seemingly inbuilt preference for choice can adversely affect the decision-making process and that presenting healthcare decisions as choices may result in less reasoned decision making. It is important that GPs encourage patients to make reasoned healthcare decisions that are informed by an evaluation of the options rather than by a simple preference for choice. Patients are likely to be less satisfied with, and experience more regret about, choices made without reasoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17925141      PMCID: PMC2151816     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  13 in total

1.  MMR and the age of unreason.

Authors:  D Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review.

Authors:  H Bekker; J G Thornton; C M Airey; J B Connelly; J Hewison; M B Robinson; J Lilleyman; M MacIntosh; A J Maule; S Michie; A D Pearman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  More patient choice in England's national health service.

Authors:  Richard Lewis
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.663

Review 4.  Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sune Rubak; Annelli Sandbaek; Torsten Lauritzen; Bo Christensen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Idealistic, impractical, impossible? Shared decision making in the real world.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  What value do consultant nurses place on the the White Paper, Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a New Direction For Community Services (DH 2006A)?

Authors:  Frazer Underwood; Dawne Garrett; Wendy Barker; Bev Waddell; Carol Lloyd; Soline Jerram
Journal:  Nurs Older People       Date:  2006-07

Review 7.  Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment.

Authors:  John M C Hutchinson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-02

8.  Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioral decision research.

Authors:  D Frisch; R T Clemen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Evaluating the quality of patient leaflets about renal replacement therapy across UK renal units.

Authors:  Anna Winterbottom; Mark Conner; Andrew Mooney; Hilary L Bekker
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome.

Authors:  Hilary L Bekker; Jenny Hewison; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Democratising and vitalising family practice by patient-centred medicine.

Authors:  Hakan Yaman; Melahat Akdeniz; Hasan Hüseyin Avci; Jürgen Howe
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2010-12

2.  Patient choice.

Authors:  James Gerrard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Choosing, deciding, or participating: what do patients want in primary care?

Authors:  Joanne Protheroe; Peter Bower
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  When should you involve patients in treatment decisions?

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The value of choice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Julie Barnett; Jane Ogden; Emma Daniells
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.