Literature DB >> 17365539

Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution.

C A Bouquet1, V Gaurier, T Shipley, L Toussaint, Y Blandin.   

Abstract

The perception of a human actor performing movements may involve processes related to action execution. This resonance of the motor system may support observational learning and imitation, and could also explain the fact that observers'/actors' movements are disturbed by the observation of a human model making different movements (Kilner et al., 2003). In this study, we tried to specify what information available in the model's behaviour triggers this influence on an observer's behaviour. In two experiments, we had participants make horizontal or vertical arm movements while observing similar movements. In the first experiment, the observers' pattern of behaviour was affected by the observation of a human model making incongruent movements. In the second experiment, similar results were obtained with participants observing a moving dot depicting either biological or non-biological motion. Movement execution was affected differentially by biological and non-biological motion observation. These results show that an observer's behaviour is sensitive to information available in biological motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365539     DOI: 10.1080/02640410600946803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  21 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation.

Authors:  Rémi L Capa; Peter J Marshall; Thomas F Shipley; Robin N Salesse; Cédric A Bouquet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-29

3.  Perceiving nonverbal behavior: neural correlates of processing movement fluency and contingency in dyadic interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra L Georgescu; Bojana Kuzmanovic; Natacha S Santos; Ralf Tepest; Gary Bente; Marc Tittgemeyer; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation.

Authors:  Desmond Mulligan; Keith R Lohse; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-29

5.  Eye movements may cause motor contagion effects.

Authors:  Merryn D Constable; John de Grosbois; Tiffany Lung; Luc Tremblay; Jay Pratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

6.  The role of implicit motor simulation on action verb memory.

Authors:  Jérémy Villatte; Laurence Taconnat; Christel Bidet-Ildei; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  How instructions modify perception: an fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency.

Authors:  James Stanley; Emma Gowen; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; David J M Kraemer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; William M Kelley; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Adaptive changes in automatic motor responses based on acquired visuomotor correspondence.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Itaguchi; Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatiotemporal movement planning and rapid adaptation for manual interaction.

Authors:  Markus Huber; Aleksandra Kupferberg; Claus Lenz; Alois Knoll; Thomas Brandt; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.