Literature DB >> 35316393

The role of implicit motor simulation on action verb memory.

Jérémy Villatte1, Laurence Taconnat2, Christel Bidet-Ildei3, Lucette Toussaint3.   

Abstract

Observation is known to improve memory for action. Previous findings linked such an effect with an easier relation processing of action components following observation compared to mere sentence reading. However, action observation also elicits implicit motor simulation, that is a processing of one's movement through the observer own motor system. We aimed to assess whether encoding of implicit motor simulation can also explain why observation is better than reading for action memory. To prevent influence of item relation processing, two studies about isolated action verbs learning were designed. In Experiment 1, action verbs were encoded with short videos of point-light human movements or with written definitions. Subsequent free recall indicated better memory for the verbs within the video clip condition. Experiment 2 compared two encoding conditions based on point-light human movement videos. Half of the verbs were learned with their normal corresponding movement (biological kinematic). For the other half of the verbs, the velocity of point-light movements was modified to create abnormal nonbiological kinematic actions. We observed better free recall for the verbs learned with biological kinematics. Taken together, those results suggest that action observation is beneficial because it allows the encoding of motor-related information (implicit motor simulation). Semantic resonance between linguistic and motor representations of action could also contribute to memory improvement. Contrary to previous studies, our results cannot be explained by an improvement of items relation processing. However, it suggests that the basic level of action verb memory is sensorimotor perception, such as implicit motor simulation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35316393     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01671-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Grounded cognition.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The sensory nature of episodic memory: sensory priming effects due to memory trace activation.

Authors:  Lionel Brunel; Elodie Labeye; Mathieu Lesourd; Rémy Versace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Incidental memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading aloud tasks: is a blue ocean more memorable than a yellow one?

Authors:  Michael J Cortese; Maya M Khanna; David Von Nordheim
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2019-04-25

5.  When seeing a dog activates the bark: multisensory generalization and distinctiveness effects.

Authors:  Lionel Brunel; Robert L Goldstone; Guillaume Vallet; Benoit Riou; Rémy Versace
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2013

6.  Are judgments for action verbs and point-light human actions equivalent?

Authors:  Christel Bidet-Ildei; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-09-20

7.  Perception of human motion.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution.

Authors:  C A Bouquet; V Gaurier; T Shipley; L Toussaint; Y Blandin
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  The kinematics, not the orientation, of an action influences language processing.

Authors:  Sophie-Anne Beauprez; Christel Bidet-Ildei
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Matteo Candidi; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.