Literature DB >> 8432374

Obstacles to prenatal care following implementation of a community-based program to reduce financial barriers.

S M Harvey1, K S Faber.   

Abstract

A study of women who gave birth in a rural Oregon county during 1988-1990 found that despite the establishment of a program to provide prenatal care to low-income women who could not afford it, the most common reasons cited for inadequate prenatal care were financial obstacles. All 13 financial, personal and organizational barriers studied were reported more frequently by the 236 women who received inadequate or no care than by the 246 women who received adequate care. Among the reasons most frequently cited by women who received inadequate care were difficulty paying for prenatal care (70%), difficulty with medical insurance (55%), ambivalence or fear about the pregnancy (46%) and transportation problems (42%). In a logistic regression analysis that controlled for social and demographic characteristics, six barriers were significant predictors of inadequate care: The odds of receiving inadequate care were 7.9 among women who had a poor understanding of or attached a low value to prenatal care compared with those who did not cite this barrier, 3.4 among those who cited financial difficulties, 3.4 among those who said they had difficulty scheduling appointments, 3.0 among those who suffered excessive physical or psychological stress, 2.7 among those who said they did not know where to go for prenatal care, and 1.8 among those who felt ambivalence or fear regarding the pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Behavior; Community Health Services; Delivery Of Health Care; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Financial Activities; Health; Health Insurance; Health Services; Health Services Evaluation; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; North America; Northern America; Obstacles; Oregon; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Characteristics; Prenatal Care; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Programs; Psychosocial Factors; Quality Of Health Care; Rural Population; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8432374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  8 in total

1.  Trends in perceived cost as a barrier to medical care, 1991-1996.

Authors:  D E Nelson; B L Thompson; S D Bland; R Rubinson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; K Marchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Mainstreaming nutrition in maternal, newborn and child health: barriers to seeking services from existing maternal, newborn, child health programmes.

Authors:  Peter K Streatfield; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Nurul Alam; Malay K Mridha
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The influence of proximity of prenatal services on small-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Katherine E Heck; Kenneth C Schoendorf; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-02

6.  [Predictors of use of ante-natal care].

Authors:  I Valadez Figueroa; N Alfaro Alfaro; A Celis de la Rosa
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the discordance between women's assessment of the timing of their prenatal care entry and the first trimester standard.

Authors:  R Sarnoff; E Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

8.  Cost as a barrier to screening mammography among underserved women.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.772

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.