OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a software algorithm to detect pregnancy episodes and maternal morbidities using automated data. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Automated records from a large integrated health care delivery system (IHDS), 1998-2001. STUDY DESIGN: Through complex linkages of multiple automated information sources, the algorithm estimated pregnancy histories. We evaluated the algorithm's accuracy by comparing selected elements of the pregnancy history obtained by the algorithm with the same elements manually abstracted from medical records by trained research staff. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The algorithm searched for potential pregnancy indicators within diagnosis and procedure codes, as well as laboratory tests, pharmacy dispensings, and imaging procedures associated with pregnancy. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 32,847 women with potential pregnancy indicators, we identified 24,680 pregnancies occuring to 21,001 women. Percent agreement between the algorithm and medical records review on pregnancy outcome, gestational age, and pregnancy outcome date ranged from 91 percent to 98 percent. The validation results were used to refine the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: This pregnancy episode grouper algorithm takes advantage of databases readily available in IHDS, and has important applications for health system management and clinical care. It can be used in other settings for ongoing surveillance and research on pregnancy outcomes, pregnancy-related morbidities, costs, and care patterns.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a software algorithm to detect pregnancy episodes and maternal morbidities using automated data. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Automated records from a large integrated health care delivery system (IHDS), 1998-2001. STUDY DESIGN: Through complex linkages of multiple automated information sources, the algorithm estimated pregnancy histories. We evaluated the algorithm's accuracy by comparing selected elements of the pregnancy history obtained by the algorithm with the same elements manually abstracted from medical records by trained research staff. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The algorithm searched for potential pregnancy indicators within diagnosis and procedure codes, as well as laboratory tests, pharmacy dispensings, and imaging procedures associated with pregnancy. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 32,847 women with potential pregnancy indicators, we identified 24,680 pregnancies occuring to 21,001 women. Percent agreement between the algorithm and medical records review on pregnancy outcome, gestational age, and pregnancy outcome date ranged from 91 percent to 98 percent. The validation results were used to refine the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: This pregnancy episode grouper algorithm takes advantage of databases readily available in IHDS, and has important applications for health system management and clinical care. It can be used in other settings for ongoing surveillance and research on pregnancy outcomes, pregnancy-related morbidities, costs, and care patterns.
Authors: Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Victoria L Holt; Vicky Cárdenas; Jennifer C Nelson; Thomas R Easterling; Carolyn Gardella; William M Callaghan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lilo T Strauss; Joy Herndon; Jeani Chang; Wilda Y Parker; Deborah A Levy; Sonya B Bowens; Suzanne B Zane; Cynthia J Berg Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2004-11-26
Authors: Adrianne C Feldstein; David H Smith; Nancy Perrin; Xiuhai Yang; Mary Rix; Marsha A Raebel; David J Magid; Steven R Simon; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-09-25
Authors: Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; Fay Menacker; Martha L Munson Journal: Natl Vital Stat Rep Date: 2003-12-17
Authors: Silvi Shah; Annette L Christianson; Karthikeyan Meganathan; Anthony C Leonard; Daniel P Schauer; Charuhas V Thakar Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Patricia M Dietz; Joanne H Rizzo; Lucinda J England; William M Callaghan; Kimberly K Vesco; F Carol Bruce; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea J Sharma; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-08
Authors: Maria Vyshnya Aslam; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Steven R Nesheim; Kristen Mahle Gray; Margaret A Lampe; Patricia Marie Dietz Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Elizabeth C Ailes; Regina M Simeone; April L Dawson; Emily E Petersen; Suzanne M Gilboa Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2016-11
Authors: Sarah C MacDonald; Jacqueline M Cohen; Alice Panchaud; Thomas F McElrath; Krista F Huybrechts; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: F Carol Bruce; Cynthia J Berg; Peter J Joski; Douglas W Roblin; William M Callaghan; Joanna E Bulkley; Donald J Bachman; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Elyse O Kharbanda; Allison L Naleway; Heather Lipkind; Lakshmi Sukumaran; Natalie L McCarthy; Saad B Omer; Lei Qian; Stanley Xu; Michael L Jackson; Vinutha Vijayadev; Nicola P Klein; James D Nordin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sherry L Farr; Patricia M Dietz; Joanne H Rizzo; Kimberly K Vesco; William M Callaghan; F Carol Bruce; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Cynthia J Berg Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.980