Literature DB >> 22855007

Health care utilization in the first year of life among small- and large- for-gestational age term infants.

Patricia M Dietz1, Joanne H Rizzo, Lucinda J England, William M Callaghan, Kimberly K Vesco, F Carol Bruce, Joanna E Bulkley, Andrea J Sharma, Mark C Hornbrook.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess if small- and large-for gestational age term infants have greater health care utilization during the first year of life. The sample included 28,215 singleton term infants (37-42 weeks) without major birth defects delivered from 1998 through 2007 and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northwest for 12 months after delivery. Birth weight for gestational age was categorized into 3 levels: <10th percentile (SGA), 10-90th percentile (AGA), >90th percentile (LGA). Length of delivery hospitalization, re-hospitalizations and sick/emergency room visits were obtained from electronic records. Logistic regression models estimated associations between birth weight category and re-hospitalization. Generalized linear models estimated adjusted mean number of sick/emergency visits. Among term infants, 6.2 % were SGA and 13.9 % were LGA. Of infants born by cesarean section, SGA infants had 2.7 higher odds [95 % 1.9, 3.8] than AGA infants of staying ≥5 nights during the delivery hospitalization; of those born vaginally, SGA infants had 1.5 higher adjusted odds [95 % 1.1, 2.1] of staying ≥4 nights. LGA compared to AGA infants had higher odds of re-hospitalization within 2 weeks of delivery [OR 1.25, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.58] and of a length of stay ≥4 days during that hospitalization [OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3, 5.0]. The adjusted mean number of sick/emergency room visits was slightly higher in SGA (7.8) than AGA (7.5) infants (P < .05). Term infants born SGA or LGA had greater health care utilization than their counterparts, although the increase in utilization beyond the initial delivery hospitalization was small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22855007     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1082-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  11 in total

1.  Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia.

Authors:  N E Stotland; A B Caughey; E M Breed; G J Escobar
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Fetal growth restriction at term: myth or reality?

Authors:  V K Minior; M Y Divon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Patricia M Dietz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard?

Authors:  J W Seeds; T Peng
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission.

Authors:  M J Maisels; E Kring
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants.

Authors:  T M Luu; F Lefebvre; P Riley; C Infante-Rivard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants.

Authors:  D D McIntire; S L Bloom; B M Casey; K J Leveno
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada.

Authors:  Xiangming Qiu; Abhay Lodha; Prakesh S Shah; K Sankaran; Mary M K Seshia; Wendy Yee; Ann Jefferies; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year.

Authors:  T Mac Bird; Janet M Bronstein; Richard W Hall; Curtis L Lowery; Richard Nugent; Glen P Mays
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Xun Zhang; Adriana Decker; Robert W Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dent Disease in Chinese Children and Findings from Heterozygous Mothers: Phenotypic Heterogeneity, Fetal Growth, and 10 Novel Mutations.

Authors:  Fucheng Li; Zhihui Yue; Tingting Xu; Minghui Chen; Liangying Zhong; Ting Liu; Xiangyi Jing; Jia Deng; Bin Hu; Yuling Liu; Haiyan Wang; Kar N Lai; Liangzhong Sun; Jinsong Liu; Patrick H Maxwell; Yiming Wang
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Expression of placental regulatory genes is associated with fetal growth.

Authors:  Maya A Deyssenroth; Qian Li; Marina Lacasaña; Yoko Nomura; Carmen Marsit; Jia Chen
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning methods for the prediction of fetal growth abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stefan Kuhle; Bryan Maguire; Hongqun Zhang; David Hamilton; Alexander C Allen; K S Joseph; Victoria M Allen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.